Cited by 13Indian and Buddhist StudiesSouth Asian Studies and DiasporaStudy and Philosophy of Religion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Encountering the Hindu “Other”: Tantrism and the Brahmans of South India

Brooks, Douglas Renfrew·1992·Journal of the American Academy of Religion

Abstract

Douglas Renfrew Brooks; Encountering the Hindu “Other”: Tantrism and the Brahmans of South India, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Volume LX, Issue

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jaarel/lx.3.405

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 13

Metadata

Authors
Brooks, D. R.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Brooks, Douglas Renfrew
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Religion
Published
1992
Volume
LX
Issue
3
Pages
405-436
ISSN
  • 0002-7189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4585
OpenAlex
W2081303815
Cited by
13
References
5
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 2
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Academy of Religion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › South Asian Studies and Diaspora
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
Hinduism, otherness, Tantra, Brahman, South India, interreligious encounter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review