The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Predominant pathogens in hospital infections
Abstract
To determine the distribution of pathogens causing nosocomial infections in United States hospitals, we analysed data from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System. From October 1986 to December 1990, amongst hospitals conducting hospital-wide surveillance, the five most commonly reported pathogens were Escherichia coli (13.7%), Staphylococcus aureus (11.2%), enterococci (10.7%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.1%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (9.7%). The commonest pathogens reported by site included, bloodstream: coagulase-negative staphylococci, S. aureus, enterococci, E. coli, and Candida spp.; lower respiratory tract infection: S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and Enterobacter spp.; surgical wound infection: S. aureus, enterococci and coagulase-negative staphylococci; and urinary tract infection: E. coli, enterococci, and P. aeruginosa. Among hospitals conducting intensive care unit (ICU) surveillance, the commonest pathogens were P. aeruginosa (12.4%), S. aureus (12.3%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (10.2%), Candida spp. (10.1%), Enterobacter spp. and enterococci (8.6% each). In the ICUs, the commonest pathogens found in the bloodstream were coagulase-negative staphylococci, S. aureus, and enterococci; in lower respiratory tract infections P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and enterococci; in surgical wound infections enterococci, coagulase-negative staphylococci, and Enterobacter spp. and in urinary tract infections Candida spp., E. coli, enterococci, P. aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp. These data show that S. aureus, E. coli and P. aeruginosa remain important nosocomial pathogens, that coagulase-negative staphylococci, enterococci and C. albicans are pathogens of increasing importance, and that the distribution of pathogens differs by site and hospital location.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Epidemiology of Candida species infections in critically ill non-immunosuppressed patients
Eggimann, P., Garbino, J., & Pittet, D. (2003) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(03)00801-6 · Cited by 900
Epidemiology of Invasive Mycoses in North America
Pfaller, M. A., & Diekema, D. J. (2010) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.3109/10408410903241444 · Cited by 901
Update on clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci
Kloos, W. E., & Bannerman, T. L. (1994) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.7.1.117 · Cited by 835
Nosocomial fungal infections: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment
Perlroth, J., Choi, B., & Spellberg, B. (2007) · Medical Mycology · doi:10.1080/13693780701218689 · Cited by 738
Blumberg, H. M., Jarvis, W. R., Soucie, J. M., Edwards, J. E., Patterson, J. E., Pfaller, M. A., Rangel‐Frausto, M. S., Rinaldi, M. G., Saiman, L., Wiblin, R. T., et al. (2001) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/321811 · Cited by 661
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jarvis, W. R., & Martone, W. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-01-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- suppl A
- Pages
- 19-24
- ISSN
- 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2091
- OpenAlex
- W2124815179
- Cited by
- 578
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predominant pathogens in hospital infections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jac/29.suppl_a.19
- The paper
- Jarvis, W. R., & Martone, W. J. (1992). Predominant pathogens in hospital infections. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/29.suppl_a.19
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.