The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of quorum-sensing deficiency on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance
Abstract
Variations in biofilm formation by, and antibiotic resistance of, Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 (wild type) and the quorum-sensing-deficient mutants PDO100 (Delta rhlI), JP1 (Delta lasI) and JP2 (Delta lasI Delta rhlI) were studied. For PAO1, the maximum-accumulation phase of biofilm formation began immediately and a plateau phase was reached after 24 h, whereas the quorum-sensing mutants showed 36-48 h lags before entering the maximum-accumulation phase. After 72 h, the cell density of the PAO1 biofilms was c. 0.8-1.2 log greater than for the mutants. On a unit protein basis, total polysaccharide production was similar for PAO1 and PDO100, whereas JP1 and JP2 biofilms accumulated only c. 36% of the PAO1 level after 72 h. Fluorescent micrographs revealed that the PAO1 biofilms were much thicker than those of the quorum-sensing-deficient mutants. In the case of the PAO1 and PDO100 biofilms, most cells were attached to the top of the biofilm layer, whereas the bottom layer consisted predominantly of polysaccharides. The JP1 and JP2 biofilms were closely packed with cells, and little polysaccharide was visible. Cells in PAO1 biofilms were little affected by kanamycin, even at 100 mg/L, whereas those in PDO100 biofilms were susceptible to the highest concentration of kanamycin (100 mg/L) but not to lower concentrations (10 and 50 mg/L). In contrast, cells in JP1 and JP2 biofilms were susceptible to kanamycin at all three concentrations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Involvement of Cell-to-Cell Signals in the Development of a Bacterial Biofilm
Davies, D. G., Parsek, M. R., Pearson, J. P., Iglewski, B. H., Costerton, J. W., & Greenberg, E. P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5361.295 · Cited by 3,396
Cited by
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lifestyle: A Paradigm for Adaptation, Survival, and Persistence
Moradali, M. F., Ghods, S., & Rehm, B. H. A. (2017) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2017.00039 · Cited by 1,537
The role of bacterial biofilms in chronic infections
Bjarnsholt, T. (2013) · APMIS · doi:10.1111/apm.12099 · Cited by 1,080
Understanding the Mechanism of Bacterial Biofilms Resistance to Antimicrobial Agents
Singh, S., Singh, S. K., Chowdhury, I., & Singh, R. (2017) · The Open Microbiology Journal · doi:10.2174/1874285801711010053 · Cited by 697
Phenazines and their role in biocontrol by Pseudomonas bacteria
Chin‐A‐Woeng, T. F. C., Bloemberg, G. V., & Lugtenberg, B. J. J. (2003) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00686.x · Cited by 375
Ciofu, O., Tolker-Nielsen, T., Jensen, P. Ø., Wang, H., & Høiby, N. (2015) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2014.11.017 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Shih, P.-C.
- Venue
- Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-02-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 309-314
- ISSN
- 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2091
- OpenAlex
- W2097478029
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of quorum-sensing deficiency on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jac/49.2.309
- The paper
- Shih, P.-C. (2002). Effects of quorum-sensing deficiency on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/49.2.309
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.