Cited by 16Indigenous Cultures and HistoryIndigenous Peoples' Rights and LawIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States

Doug Kiel·2016·Journal of American History

Abstract

In this ambitious synthesis, targeted at a nonspecialist audience, Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz aims to weave the threads of the past two decades of Native American history scholarship into a coherent narrative. Rather than adding native voices to a familiar U.S. history framework, she attempts nothing short of rewriting the U.S. national narrative with empire at its heart. The result is an incisive volume that bridges past and present, employing scholarship on settler colonialism to highlight not only the ongoing effects of colonialism in Indian country but also the ways colonialism endures as a domestic and international structural principle of the United States. Despite its title the book serves less as a history of indigenous peoples in the United States than an effort “to tell the story of the United States as a colonialist settler-state” (p. 14). The first chapter, “Follow the Corn,” paints a portrait of a vibrant and interconnected Western Hemisphere prior to 1492. Dunbar-Ortiz then presents a series of essays that subdivide U.S. history into periods corresponding to different stages of colonialism. She is skeptical of the scholarly emphasis on cross-cultural negotiation between indigenous people and Europeans, viewing such a focus as an attempt to sidestep colonial guilt, and she rejects the narrative that native people were hapless victims of epidemic disease. Instead, she emphasizes disturbing moments of massacre and territorial dispossession, making the case for systematic genocide as a pattern that “drill[s] to the core of U.S. history, to the very source of the country's existence” (p. xiii). To make her case, Dunbar-Ortiz turns to histories of federal Indian policy and explores numerous cultural and political themes. For instance, she notes how key figures gained celebrity status as Indian killers, narrates the American Revolution as populist imperialism, unpacks “Indian country” terminology and symbolism in the U.S. military, and highlights statements by President Barack Obama that deny U.S. colonialism.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jahist/jaw196

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kiel, D.
Corresponding author
Doug Kiel
Venue
Journal of American History
Published
2016-08-29
Volume
103
Issue
2
Pages
448-449
ISSN
  • 0021-8723 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-2314
OpenAlex
W2743353737
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of American History (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Keywords
Native American history, settler colonialism, colonialism, genocide, federal Indian policy, Indian massacres, territorial dispossession, colonial guilt, American Revolution, imperialism, Indian Country

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review