Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rapid design and implementation of an integrated patient self-triage and self-scheduling tool for COVID-19

Open access
Judson, Timothy J, Odisho, Anobel Y, Neinstein, Aaron B, Chao, Jessica, Williams, Aimee, Miller, Christopher, Moriarty, Tim, Gleason, Nathaniel, Intinarelli, Gina, Gonzales, Ralph·2020·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

Objective: To rapidly deploy a digital patient-facing self-triage and self-scheduling tool in a large academic health system to address the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: We created a patient portal-based COVID-19 self-triage and self-scheduling tool and made it available to all primary care patients at the University of California, San Francisco Health, a large academic health system. Asymptomatic patients were asked about exposure history and were then provided relevant information. Symptomatic patients were triaged into 1 of 4 categories—emergent, urgent, nonurgent, or self-care—and then connected with the appropriate level of care via direct scheduling or telephone hotline. Results: This self-triage and self-scheduling tool was designed and implemented in under 2 weeks. During the first 16 days of use, it was completed 1129 times by 950 unique patients. Of completed sessions, 315 (28%) were by asymptomatic patients, and 814 (72%) were by symptomatic patients. Symptomatic patient triage dispositions were as follows: 193 emergent (24%), 193 urgent (24%), 99 nonurgent (12%), 329 self-care (40%). Sensitivity for detecting emergency-level care was 87.5% (95% CI 61.7–98.5%). Discussion: This self-triage and self-scheduling tool has been widely used by patients and is being rapidly expanded to other populations and health systems. The tool has recommended emergency-level care with high sensitivity, and decreased triage time for patients with less severe illness. The data suggests it also prevents unnecessary triage messages, phone calls, and in-person visits. Conclusion: Patient self-triage tools integrated into electronic health record systems have the potential to greatly improve triage efficiency and prevent unnecessary visits during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jamia/ocaa051

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
Judson, T. J., Odisho, A. Y., Neinstein, A. B., Chao, J., Williams, A., Miller, C., Moriarty, T., Gleason, N., Intinarelli, G., & Gonzales, R.
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2020-05-13
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
860-866
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W3014520892
Cited by
195
References
2
FWCI
26.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid design and implementation of an integrated patient self-triage and self-scheduling tool for COVID-19. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jamia/ocaa051
The paper
Judson, T. J., Odisho, A. Y., Neinstein, A. B., Chao, J., Williams, A., Miller, C., Moriarty, T., Gleason, N., Intinarelli, G., & Gonzales, R. (2020). Rapid design and implementation of an integrated patient self-triage and self-scheduling tool for COVID-19. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa051

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.