Cited by 56Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesMachine Learning in HealthcarePharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

Ensemble method–based extraction of medication and related information from clinical texts

Open access
Kim, Youngjun, Meystre, Stéphane M·2020·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

Objective: Accurate and complete information about medications and related information is crucial for effective clinical decision support and precise health care. Recognition and reduction of adverse drug events is also central to effective patient care. The goal of this research is the development of a natural language processing (NLP) system to automatically extract medication and adverse drug event information from electronic health records. This effort was part of the 2018 n2c2 shared task on adverse drug events and medication extraction. Materials and Methods: The new NLP system implements a stacked generalization based on a search-based structured prediction algorithm for concept extraction. We trained 4 sequential classifiers using a variety of structured learning algorithms. To enhance accuracy, we created a stacked ensemble consisting of these concept extraction models trained on the shared task training data. We implemented a support vector machine model to identify related concepts. Results: Experiments with the official test set showed that our stacked ensemble achieved an F1 score of 92.66%. The relation extraction model with given concepts reached a 93.59% F1 score. Our end-to-end system yielded overall micro-averaged recall, precision, and F1 score of 92.52%, 81.88% and 86.88%, respectively. Our NLP system for adverse drug events and medication extraction ranked within the top 5 of teams participating in the challenge. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that a stacked ensemble with a search-based structured prediction algorithm achieved good performance by effectively integrating the output of individual classifiers and could provide a valid solution for other clinical concept extraction tasks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jamia/ocz100

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, Y., & Meystre, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Biomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2019-07-08
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
31-38
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W2995481601
Cited by
56
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • SmartState Program
  • Translational Biomedical Informatics Chair Endowment
  • SC Research Centers for Economic Excellence
  • NIH
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
medication extraction, adverse drug reactions, clinical concept extraction, stacking ensemble, relation extraction, electronic health records, clinical decision support
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Humans, Natural Language Processing, Information Storage and Retrieval, Narration, Electronic Health Records, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review