Ensemble method–based extraction of medication and related information from clinical texts
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Accurate and complete information about medications and related information is crucial for effective clinical decision support and precise health care. Recognition and reduction of adverse drug events is also central to effective patient care. The goal of this research is the development of a natural language processing (NLP) system to automatically extract medication and adverse drug event information from electronic health records. This effort was part of the 2018 n2c2 shared task on adverse drug events and medication extraction. Materials and Methods: The new NLP system implements a stacked generalization based on a search-based structured prediction algorithm for concept extraction. We trained 4 sequential classifiers using a variety of structured learning algorithms. To enhance accuracy, we created a stacked ensemble consisting of these concept extraction models trained on the shared task training data. We implemented a support vector machine model to identify related concepts. Results: Experiments with the official test set showed that our stacked ensemble achieved an F1 score of 92.66%. The relation extraction model with given concepts reached a 93.59% F1 score. Our end-to-end system yielded overall micro-averaged recall, precision, and F1 score of 92.52%, 81.88% and 86.88%, respectively. Our NLP system for adverse drug events and medication extraction ranked within the top 5 of teams participating in the challenge. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that a stacked ensemble with a search-based structured prediction algorithm achieved good performance by effectively integrating the output of individual classifiers and could provide a valid solution for other clinical concept extraction tasks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies have shown that adopting an ensemble method could further improve clinical NER performances.
“Previous studies [38-41] have shown that adopting an ensemble method could further improve the clinical NER performances.”
From Extracting Family History of Patients From Clinical Narratives: Exploring an End-to-End Solution With Deep Learning Models (2020) · cites this paper as [40]
Cites
Savova, G. K., Kipper-Schuler, K. C., Hurdle, J. F., & Meystre, S. M. (2008) · Yearbook of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1638592 · Cited by 895 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yang, X., Zhang, H., He, X., Bian, J., & Wu, Y. (2020) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/22982 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Witte, C., Schmidt, D. M., & Cimiano, P. (2024) · Journal of Biomedical Semantics · doi:10.1186/s13326-024-00305-2 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kim, Y., & Meystre, S. M.
- Affiliations
- Biomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- ORCID
- Meystre, Stéphane M
- Venue
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-07-08
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-38
- ISSN
- 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-974X
- PMC
- PMC7489099
- OpenAlex
- W2995481601
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- SmartState Program
- Translational Biomedical Informatics Chair Endowment
- SC Research Centers for Economic Excellence
- NIH
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
- Keywords
- medication extraction, adverse drug reactions, clinical concept extraction, stacking ensemble, relation extraction, electronic health records, clinical decision support
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Humans, Natural Language Processing, Information Storage and Retrieval, Narration, Electronic Health Records, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review