Cited by 3Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsUsability and User Interface DesignHealth, Technology, Consumer Behavior

Evaluating and improving the usability of a mHealth platform to assess postoperative dental pain

Open access
Ibarra-Noriega, Ana M, Yansane, Alfa, Mullins, Joanna, Simmons, Kristen, Skourtes, Nicholas, Holmes, David, White, Joel, Kalenderian, Elsbeth +1 more·2024·JAMIA Open

Abstract

Objectives: The use of interactive mobile health (mHealth) applications to monitor patient-reported postoperative pain outcomes is an emerging area in dentistry that requires further exploration. This study aimed to evaluate and improve the usability of an existing mHealth application. Materials and methods: The usability of the application was assessed iteratively using a 3-phase approach, including a rapid cognitive walkthrough (Phase I), lab-based usability testing (Phase II), and in situ pilot testing (Phase III). The study team conducted Phase I, while providers and patients participated in Phase II and III. Results: The rapid cognitive walkthrough identified 23 potential issues that could negatively impact user experience, with the majority classified as system issues. The lab-based usability testing yielded 141 usability issues.; 43% encountered by patients and 57% by dentists. Usability problems encountered during pilot testing included undelivered messages due to mobile phone carrier and service-related issues, errors in patients’ phone number data entry, and problems in provider training. Discussion: Through collaborative and iterative work with the vendor, usability issues were addressed before launching a trial to assess its efficacy. Conclusion: The usability of the mHealth application for postoperative dental pain was remarkably improved by the iterative analysis and interdisciplinary collaboration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae018

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ibarra-Noriega, A. M., Yansane, A., Mullins, J., Simmons, K., Skourtes, N., Holmes, D., White, J., Kalenderian, E., & Walji, M. F.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Skourtes Institute , Hillsboro, OR 97124, United States
  • FollowApp.Care , London, W1G 8GE, United Kingdom
  • Marquette University (US)
Corresponding author
Walji, Muhammad F
Venue
JAMIA Open
Published
2024-01-04
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
ooae018-ooae018
ISSN
2574-2531 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392712125
Cited by
3
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMIA Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (U18HS026135)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
Keywords
mobile health, mobile health apps, usability evaluation, postoperative dental pain, patient-reported outcomes, usability testing, dentists, patient experience, mobile messaging, iterative design, interdisciplinary collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review