The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AOAC INTERNATIONAL Methods Committee Guidelines for Validation of Qualitative and Quantitative Food Microbiological Official Methods of Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Responding to a need for a guide for conducting Official Method validation studies of microbiological methods, AOAC utilized the experience of three microbiologists who have been active in the field of method validation. In collaboration, a document was prepared which covered the following areas: terms and their definitions associated with the Official Methods program (e.g., reference methods, alternative methods, and ruggedness testing), protocols and validation requirements for qualitative methods versus those for quantitative methods, the concept of the precollaborative study, ruggedness testing, tests for significant differences, performance indicators, and the approval process. After its preparation, this document was reviewed by the members of the Methods Committee on Microbiology and Extraneous Materials and by members of the Official Methods Board. Herein is presented the approved version of that document.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to Statistical Analysis.
Cochran, W. G., Dixon, W. J., & Massey, F. J. (1957) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2280909 · Cited by 955
Cited by
Green Synthesis of Nanofertilizers and Their Application as a Foliar for Cucurbita pepo L
Shebl, A., Hassan, A. A., Salama, D. M., Abd El-Aziz, M. E., & Abd Elwahed, M. S. A. (2019) · Journal of Nanomaterials · doi:10.1155/2019/3476347 · Cited by 130
Winarni Agustini, T., Farid Ma’ruf, W., Widayat, W., Suzery, M., Hadiyanto, H., & Benjakul, S. (2016) · Jurnal Teknologi · doi:10.11113/jt.v78.8216 · Cited by 71
Growth curve, blood parameters and carcass traits of grass-fed Angus steers
Carrillo, J. A., Bai, Y., He, Y., Li, Y., Cai, W., Bickhart, D. M., Liu, G., Barao, S. M., Sonstegard, T., & Song, J. (2021) · Animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2021.100381 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Feldsine, P., Abeyta, C., & Andrews, W. H.
- Venue
- Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-09-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1187-1200
- ISSN
- 1060-3271 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7922
- OpenAlex
- W1540378334
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AOAC INTERNATIONAL Methods Committee Guidelines for Validation of Qualitative and Quantitative Food Microbiological Official Methods of Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jaoac/85.5.1187
- The paper
- Feldsine, P., Abeyta, C., & Andrews, W. H. (2002). AOAC INTERNATIONAL Methods Committee Guidelines for Validation of Qualitative and Quantitative Food Microbiological Official Methods of Analysis. Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/85.5.1187
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.