Cited by 10Microbial infections and disease researchAnimal health and immunologyAnimal Disease Management and Epidemiology

Predicting bovine respiratory disease outcome in feedlot cattle using latent class analysis

Open access
Blakebrough-Hall, Claudia, Hick, Paul, González, Luciano A·2020·Journal of Animal Science

Abstract

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is the most significant disease affecting feedlot cattle. Indicators of BRD often used in feedlots such as visual signs, rectal temperature, computer-assisted lung auscultation (CALA) score, the number of BRD treatments, presence of viral pathogens, viral seroconversion, and lung damage at slaughter vary in their ability to predict an animal’s BRD outcome, and no studies have been published determining how a combination of these BRD indicators may define the number of BRD disease outcome groups. The objectives of the current study were (1) to identify BRD outcome groups using BRD indicators collected during the feeding phase and at slaughter through latent class analysis (LCA) and (2) to determine the importance of these BRD indicators to predict disease outcome. Animals with BRD (n = 127) were identified by visual signs and removed from production pens for further examination. Control animals displaying no visual signs of BRD (n = 143) were also removed and examined. Blood, nasal swab samples, and clinical measurements were collected. Lung and pleural lesions indicative of BRD were scored at slaughter. LCA was applied to identify possible outcome groups. Three latent classes were identified in the best model fit, categorized as non-BRD, mild BRD, and severe BRD. Animals in the mild BRD group had a higher probability of having visual signs of BRD compared with non-BRD and severe BRD animals. Animals in the severe BRD group were more likely to require more than 1 treatment for BRD and have ≥40 °C rectal temperature, ≥10% total lung consolidation, and severe pleural lesions at slaughter. Animals in the severe BRD group were also more likely to be naïve at feedlot entry and the first BRD pull for Bovine Viral Diarrhoea Virus, Bovine Parainfluenza 3 Virus, and Bovine Adenovirus and have a positive nasal swab result for Bovine Herpesvirus Type 1 and Bovine Coronavirus. Animals with severe BRD had 0.9 and 0.6 kg/d lower overall ADG (average daily gain) compared with non-BRD animals and mild BRD animals (P < 0.001). These results demonstrate that there are important indicators of BRD severity. Using this information to predict an animal’s BRD outcome would greatly enhance treatment efficacy and aid in better management of animals at risk of suffering from severe BRD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jas/skaa381

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A prior study reported 95% accuracy for blood metabolome analysis with a smaller sample size of 50 BRD animals and ten controls.

    “This accuracy rate is marginally lower than the 95% reported in a prior study, which had a smaller sample size consisting of 50 BRD animals and ten controls [201,202].”

    From Strategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview (2024) · cites this paper as [202]

    The Materials and Methods section describes 127 cattle with visual signs of BRD and 143 visually healthy controls, not 50 BRD animals and ten controls. The paper analyzes BRD outcomes using latent class analysis and describes blood testing for viral antibodies; it does not report 95% accuracy for blood metabolome analysis. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 10

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Avra T. D., Abell K. M., Shane D. D., Theurer M. E., Larson R. L., and White B. J.. 2017 A retrospective analysis of risk factors associated with bovine respiratory disease treatment failure in feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 95: 1521– 1527. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016.1254 28464093 · DOI
  2. Babcock A. H., White B. J., Renter D. G., Dubnicka S. R., and Scott H. M.. 2013 Predicting cumulative risk of bovine respiratory disease complex (BRDC) using feedlot arrival data and daily morbidity and mortality counts. Can. J. Vet. Res. 77: 33– 44 23814354 PMC3525170
  3. Baruch J., Cernicchiaro N., Cull C. A., Lechtenberg K. F., Nickell J. S., and Renter D. G.. 2019 Performance of multiple diagnostic methods in assessing the progression of bovine respiratory disease in calves challenged with infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus and Mannheimia haemolytica1. J. Anim. Sci. 97: 2357– 2367. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz107 30923802 PMC6541804 · DOI
  4. Blakebrough-Hall C., Dona A., D’occhio M. J., McMeniman J., and González L. A.. 2020a Diagnosis of bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle using blood 1H NMR metabolomics. Sci. Rep. 10: 115. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56809-w 31924818 PMC6954258 · DOI
  5. Blakebrough-Hall C., McMeniman J. P., and González L. A.. 2020b An evaluation of the economic effects of bovine respiratory disease on animal performance, carcass traits and economic outcomes in feedlot cattle defined using four BRD diagnosis methods. J. Anim. Sci. 98: 1– 11. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa005 PMC6996507 31930299 · DOI
  6. Buczinski S., L Ollivett T., and Dendukuri N.. 2015 Bayesian estimation of the accuracy of the calf respiratory scoring chart and ultrasonography for the diagnosis of bovine respiratory disease in pre-weaned dairy calves. Prev. Vet. Med. 119: 227– 231. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.02.018 25794838 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cusack P. M., McMeniman N., and Lean I. J.. 2003 The medicine and epidemiology of bovine respiratory disease in feedlots. Aust. Vet. J. 81: 480– 487. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2003.tb13367.x 15086084 · DOI
  8. Edwards T. A 2010 Control methods for bovine respiratory disease for feedlot cattle. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 26: 273– 284. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2010.03.005 20619184 · DOI
  9. Fulton R. W., and Confer A. W.. 2012 Laboratory test descriptions for bovine respiratory disease diagnosis and their strengths and weaknesses: gold standards for diagnosis, do they exist? Can. Vet. J. 53: 754– 761. 23277642 PMC3377458
  10. Fulton R. W., Ridpath J. F., Saliki J. T., Briggs R. E., Confer A. W., Burge L. J., Purdy C. W., Loan R. W., Duff G. C., and Payton M. E.. 2002 Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus (BVDV) 1b: predominant BVDV subtype in calves with respiratory disease. Can. J. Vet. Res. 66: 181– 190. 12146890 PMC227002
  11. Hay K. E., Barnes T. S., Morton J. M., Gravel J. L., Commins M. A., Horwood P. F., Ambrose R. C., Clements A. C. A., and Mahony T. J.. 2016 Associations between exposure to viruses and bovine respiratory disease in Australian feedlot cattle. Prev. Vet. Med. 127: 121– 133. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.01.024 26972273 PMC7114119 · DOI
  12. Hick P. M., Read A. J., Lugton I., Busfield F., Dawood K. E., Gabor L., Hornitzky M., and Kirkland P. D.. 2012 Coronavirus infection in intensively managed cattle with respiratory disease. Aust. Vet. J. 90: 381– 386. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2012.00978.x 23004228 PMC7159657 · DOI
  13. Horwood P. F., and Mahony T. J.. 2011 Multiplex real-time RT-PCR detection of three viruses associated with the bovine respiratory disease complex. J. Virol. Methods 171: 360– 363. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.11.020 21126537 · DOI
  14. Kleiboeker S. B., Lee S. M., Jones C. A., and Estes D. M.. 2003 Evaluation of shedding of bovine herpesvirus 1, bovine viral diarrhea virus 1, and bovine viral diarrhea virus 2 after vaccination of calves with a multivalent modified-live virus vaccine. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 222: 1399– 1403. doi: 10.2460/javma.2003.222.1399 12762386 · DOI
  15. Lanza S. T., Collins L. M., Lemmon D. R., and Schafer J. L.. 2007 PROC LCA: A SAS procedure for latent class analysis. Struct. Equ. Modeling 14: 671– 694. doi: 10.1080/10705510701575602 19953201 PMC2785099 · DOI
  16. Mang A. V., Buczinski S., Booker C. W., and Timsit E.. 2015 Evaluation of a computer-aided lung auscultation system for diagnosis of bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 29: 1112– 1116. doi: 10.1111/jvim.12657 26059327 PMC4895372 · DOI
  17. Nickell J., Woodward B., and Renter D.. 2018 Retrospective evaluation of clinical outcomes among cattle evaluated with a computer- aided lung auscultation system at the time of bovine respiratory disease diagnosis. J. Anim. Sci. 96: 513– 514. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky404.1123 · DOI
  18. O’Connor A., Martin S. W., Harland R., Shewen P., and Menzies P.. 2001 The relationship between the occurrence of undifferentiated bovine respiratory disease and titer changes to Haemophilus somnus and Mannheimia haemolytica at 3 Ontario feedlots. Can. J. Vet. Res. 65: 143– 150. 11480518 PMC1189667
  19. Polkinghorne R., Watson R., Thompson J. M., and Pethick D. W.. 2008 Current usage and future development of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) grading system. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 48: 1459– 1464. doi: 10.1071/EA07175 · DOI
  20. Richeson J. T., Beck P. A., Gadberry M. S., Gunter S. A., Hess T. W., Hubbell D. S. 3rd, and Jones C.. 2008 Effects of on-arrival versus delayed modified live virus vaccination on health, performance, and serum infectious bovine rhinotracheitis titers of newly received beef calves. J. Anim. Sci. 86: 999– 1005. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0593 18192559 · DOI
  21. Schneider M. J., Tait R. G. Jr, Busby W. D., and Reecy J. M.. 2009 An evaluation of bovine respiratory disease complex in feedlot cattle: impact on performance and carcass traits using treatment records and lung lesion scores. J. Anim. Sci. 87: 1821– 1827. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1283 19181770 · DOI
  22. Taylor J. D., Fulton R. W., Lehenbauer T. W., Step D. L., and Confer A. W.. 2010 The epidemiology of bovine respiratory disease: what is the evidence for predisposing factors? Can. Vet. J. 51: 1095– 1102. 21197200 PMC2942046
  23. Theurer M. E., Anderson D. E., White B. J., Miesner M. D., Mosier D. A., Coetzee J. F., Lakritz J., and Amrine D. E.. 2013 Effect of Mannheimia haemolytica pneumonia on behavior and physiologic responses of calves during high ambient environmental temperatures. J. Anim. Sci. 91: 3917– 3929. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5823 23658357 · DOI · Paper page
  24. van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk S., Myers D., Doig P. A., Karvonen B., Habermehl M., Babiuk L. A., Jelinski M., Van Donkersgoed J., Schlesinger K., and Rinehart C.. 2001 Identification of a mutant Bovine Herpesvirus-1 (BHV-1) in post-arrival outbreaks of IBR in feedlot calves and protection with conventional vaccination. Can. J. Vet. Res. 65: 81– 88. 11346260 PMC1189653
  25. White B. J., and Renter D. G.. 2009 Bayesian estimation of the performance of using clinical observations and harvest lung lesions for diagnosing bovine respiratory disease in post-weaned beef calves. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 21: 446– 453. doi: 10.1177/104063870902100405 19564492 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Blakebrough-Hall, C., Hick, P., & González, L. A.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Blakebrough-Hall, Claudia
Venue
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2020-11-28
Volume
98
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3163
OpenAlex
W3107256628
Cited by
10
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Keywords
bovine respiratory disease, feedlot cattle, disease outcome prediction, latent class analysis, lung consolidation, pleural lesions, rectal temperature, bovine viral diarrhea virus, bovine parainfluenza virus type 3, bovine adenovirus, bovine herpesvirus 1, bovine coronavirus, average daily gain
MeSH terms
Latent Class Analysis, Animals, Auscultation, Body Temperature, Cattle, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Lung, Male, Nasal Mucosa, New South Wales, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome, Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review