The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Normalization of Urinary Drug Concentrations with Specific Gravity and Creatinine
Open accessAbstract
Excessive fluid intake can substantially dilute urinary drug concentrations and result in false-negative reports for drug users. Methods for correction ("normalization") of drug/metabolite concentrations in urine have been utilized by anti-doping laboratories, pain monitoring programs, and in environmental monitoring programs to compensate for excessive hydration, but such procedures have not been used routinely in workplace, legal, and treatment settings. We evaluated two drug normalization procedures based on specific gravity and creatinine. These corrections were applied to urine specimens collected from three distinct groups (pain patients, heroin users, and marijuana/ cocaine users). Each group was unique in characteristics, study design, and dosing conditions. The results of the two normalization procedures were highly correlated (r=0.94; range, 0.78-0.99). Increases in percent positives by specific gravity and creatinine normalization were small (0.3% and -1.0%, respectively) for heroin users (normally hydrated subjects), modest (4.2-9.8%) for pain patients (unknown hydration state), and substantial (2- to 38-fold increases) for marijuana/cocaine users (excessively hydrated subjects). Despite some limitations, these normalization procedures provide alternative means of dealing with highly dilute, dilute, and concentrated urine specimens. Drug/metabolite concentration normalization by these procedures is recommended for urine testing programs, especially as a means of coping with dilute specimens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mass spectrometric based approaches in urine metabolomics and biomarker discovery
Khamis, M. M., Adamko, D. J., & El‐Aneed, A. (2017) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.21455 · Cited by 342
High-resolution metabolomics of occupational exposure to trichloroethylene
Walker, D. I., Uppal, K., Zhang, L., Vermeulen, R., Smith, M., Hu, W., Purdue, M. P., Tang, X., Reiss, B., Kim, S., et al. (2016) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyw218 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Cone, E. J., Caplan, Y. H., Moser, F., Robert, T., Shelby, M. K., & Black, D. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Analytical Toxicology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-01-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-7
- ISSN
- 0146-4760 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-2403
- OpenAlex
- W2144000512
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Normalization of Urinary Drug Concentrations with Specific Gravity and Creatinine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jat/33.1.1
- The paper
- Cone, E. J., Caplan, Y. H., Moser, F., Robert, T., Shelby, M. K., & Black, D. L. (2009). Normalization of Urinary Drug Concentrations with Specific Gravity and Creatinine. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/33.1.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.