Cited by 8Forensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentPoisoning and overdose treatments

Fentanyl-related deaths in Ontario, Canada: toxicological findings and circumstances of death in 4395 cases (2020–22)

Open access
Adamo, Alexandra, Marshall, Karlie, Woodall, Karen L·2024·Journal of Analytical Toxicology

Abstract

Over the last 20 years, there has been a significant increase in fentanyl-related deaths in Ontario, Canada. This report examines toxicological findings in a series of death investigations in which fentanyl was quantitated to identify the prevalence, trends, and demographic data associated with fentanyl in Ontario, Canada, and to highlight the changes in these trends since fentanyl began appearing in casework in Ontario in the early 2000s. A retrospective study of all cases in which fentanyl was quantitated in blood, using liquid chromatography (LC)–tandem mass spectrometry (MS-MS), was conducted for the time period between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2022. A total of 4395 cases were included; 77% of the decedents were male, and 23% was female with ages ranging from 0 to 95 years. The most frequently classified cause of death was mixed drug toxicity (69%) followed by fentanyl intoxication at 19%. Less than 10% of cases where fentanyl was quantitated were classified as nondrug-related deaths. Fentanyl concentrations in all cases ranged from 1.3 to >2000 ng/mL. Other drugs were frequently detected with fentanyl. In mixed drug toxicity cases, stimulants were the most frequently encountered class of drugs: cocaine was identified in 51.8%, and methamphetamine was observed in 43.0% of cases. Detailed reports for select cases were included to provide additional insight into the different case types and to show the difficulty in interpreting blood concentrations without additional detailed case histories. This study provides valuable information for the scientific and medical community regarding the continued use of fentanyl and how patterns of fentanyl use have evolved since it began to appear in forensic casework.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jat/bkae061

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Isotonitazene produces the active metabolite N-desethyl isotonitazene, which is more potent than its parent compound.

    “According to vandeputte et al. [7], isotonitazene produces the active metabolite N-desethyl isotonitazene, which is more potent than its parent compound [20].”

    From Nitazenes: review of comparative pharmacology and antagonist action (2025) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Results section reports isotonitazene among substances detected with fentanyl (n = 30), but does not discuss its metabolism or potency. Searches for N-desethyl isotonitazene and for metabolite potency found no passage addressing the claim; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [1]Belzak L, Halverson J. The opioid crisis in Canada: a national perspective. health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada. Res Policy Pract 2018; 38: 224– 33. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.38.6.02 PMC6034966 29911818 · DOI
  2. [2]Imtiaz S, Shield KD, Fischer B et al. Recent changes in trends of opioid overdose deaths in North America. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2020; 15: 1– 9. doi: 10.1186/s13011-020-00308-z 32867799 PMC7457770 · DOI
  3. [4]Stanley TH. The fentanyl story. J Pain 2014; 15: 1215– 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.08.010 25441689 · DOI
  4. [5]Kuhlman JJ Jr, McCaulley R, Valouch TJ et al. Fentanyl use, misuse, and abuse: a summary of 23 postmortem cases. J Anal Toxicol 2003; 27: 499– 504. doi: 10.1093/jat/27.7.499 14607006 · DOI
  5. [6]Martin TL, Woodall KL, McLellan BA. Fentanyl-related deaths in Ontario, Canada: toxicological findings and circumstances of death in 112 cases (2002–2004). J Anal Toxicol 2006; 30: 603– 10. doi: 10.1093/jat/30.8.603 17132259 · DOI
  6. [7]Woodall KL, Martin TL, McLellan BA. Oral abuse of fentanyl patches (Duragesic®): seven case reports. J Forensic Sci 2008; 53: 222– 25. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00597.x 18279262 · DOI
  7. [8]Anderson DT, Muto JJ. Duragesic® transdermal patch: postmortem tissue distribution of fentanyl in 25 cases. J Anal Toxicol 2000; 24: 627– 34. doi: 10.1093/jat/24.7.627 11043670 · DOI
  8. [9]Cooper G. The rise and rise of fentanyl in postmortem casework. J Forensic Sci 2023; 68: 1675– 85. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15353 37529890 · DOI
  9. [10]Ellefsen KN, Smith CR, Taylor EA et al. Emergence of fentanyl‐related deaths in Travis County, Texas and surrounding areas: a retrospective review of postmortem fentanyl‐related drug toxicities from 2020 to 2022. J Forensic Sci 2023; 68: 1662– 74. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15283 37194396 · DOI
  10. [11]Daniulaityte R, Juhascik MP, Strayer KE et al. Trends in fentanyl and fentanyl analogue-related overdose deaths—Montgomery County, Ohio, 2015–2017. Drug Alcohol Depend 2019; 198: 116– 20. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.01.045 30909018 PMC9419823 · DOI
  11. [12]Han Y, Yan W, Zheng Y et al. The rising crisis of illicit fentanyl use, overdose, and potential therapeutic strategies. Transl Psychiatry 2019; 9: 282. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0625-0 PMC6848196 31712552 · DOI
  12. [13]Fischer B, Pang M, Tyndall M. The opioid death crisis in Canada: crucial lessons for public health. Lancet Public Health 2019; 4: e81– 2. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30232-9 30579840 · DOI
  13. [15]Scientific Working Group for Forensic Toxicology (SWGTOX). Standard practices for method validation in forensic toxicology. J Anal Toxicol 2013; 37: 452– 74. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkt054 23934984 · DOI
  14. [16]Davis GG, Fligner CL. The effects of the (fentanyl‐fueled) drug overdose epidemic on medicolegal death investigation in the United States. J Forensic Sci 2023; 68: 1626– 31. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15304 37306311 · DOI
  15. [17]Jannetto PJ, Helander A, Garg U et al. The fentanyl epidemic and evolution of fentanyl analogs in the United States and the European Union. Clin Chem 2019; 65: 242– 53. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.281626 30305277 · DOI
  16. [18]Martinez J, Gonyea J, Zaney ME et al. The evolution of fentanyl-related substances: prevalence and drug concentrations in postmortem biological specimens at the Miami-Dade Medical Examiner Department. J Anal Toxicol 2024; 48: 104– 10. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkad089 38123469 · DOI
  17. [19]Palis H, Xavier C, Dobrer S et al. Concurrent use of opioids and stimulants and risk of fatal overdose: a cohort study. BMC Public Health 2022; 22: 2084. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14506-w PMC9664696 36380298 · DOI
  18. [20]Gerostamoulos D, Elliott S, Walls HC et al. To measure or not to measure? That is the NPS question. J Anal Toxicol 2016; 40: 318– 20. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkw013 26977105 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adamo, A., Marshall, K., & Woodall, K. L.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Woodall, Karen L
Venue
Journal of Analytical Toxicology
Published
2024-07-05
Volume
48
Issue
8
Pages
598-605
ISSN
  • 0146-4760 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-2403
OpenAlex
W4400378256
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Analytical Toxicology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
Keywords
fentanyl, toxicological findings, plasma drug concentration, cocaine, methamphetamine, stimulants, forensic toxicology, Ontario, drug use trends
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analgesics, Opioid, Cause of Death, Child, Child, Preschool, Chromatography, Liquid, Female, Fentanyl, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Ontario, Retrospective Studies, Substance Abuse Detection, Forensic Toxicology, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Young Adult, Drug Overdose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review