The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Religious Deregulation: Origins and Consequences
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The implication of Yang's triple-market theory is that the level of state regulation should be taken as an independent variable that shapes the structure of the religious market and hence religious behaviors (see also Finke 1990; Chaves and Cann 1992).”
From Catholicism and Its Civic Engagement: Case Studies of the Catholic Church in Hong Kong, Macau, Taipei, and Shanghai (2014) · cites this paper as Finke 1990
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hao, Z., Kuo, W.-B., Chan, S. H., Jing, M., & Tam, Y. F. (2014) · Review of Religion and Chinese Society · doi:10.1163/22143955-04102005 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Finke, R.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Finke, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Church and State
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-06-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 609-626
- ISSN
- 0021-969X (ISSN-L)
- 2040-4867
- OpenAlex
- W2320355756
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 22.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Church and State (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Religious Freedom and Discrimination
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › American Constitutional Law and Politics
- Keywords
- religious freedom, church-state relations, religious regulation, religious law
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Religious Deregulation: Origins and Consequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jcs/32.3.609
- The paper
- Finke, R. (1990). Religious Deregulation: Origins and Consequences. Journal of Church and State. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcs/32.3.609
