The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Protecting against water loss: analysis of the barrier properties of plant cuticles
Open accessAbstract
The cuticle is the major barrier against uncontrolled water loss from leaves, fruits and other primary parts of higher plants. More than 100 mean values for water permeabilities determined with isolated leaf and fruit cuticles from 61 plant species are compiled and discussed in relation to plant organ, natural habitat and morphology. The maximum barrier properties of plant cuticles exceed that of synthetic polymeric films of equal thickness. Cuticular water permeability is not correlated to the thickness of the cuticle or to wax coverage. Relationships between cuticular permeability, wax composition and physical properties of the cuticle are evaluated. Cuticular permeability to water increases on the average by a factor of 2 when leaf surface temperature is raised from 15 degrees C to 35 degrees C. Organic compounds of anthropogenic and biogenic origin may enhance cuticular permeability. The pathway taken by water across the cuticular transport barrier is reviewed. The conclusion from this discussion is that the bulk of water diffuses as single molecules across a lipophilic barrier while a minor fraction travels along polar pores. Open questions concerning the mechanistic understanding of the plant cuticular transport barrier and the role the plant cuticle plays in ensuring the survival and reproductive success of an individual plant are indicated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A first assessment of the impact of the extreme 2018 summer drought on Central European forests
Schuldt, B., Buras, A., Arend, M., Vitasse, Y., Beierkuhnlein, C., Damm, A., Gharun, M., Grams, T. E. E., Hauck, M., Hajek, P., et al. (2020) · Basic and Applied Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.baae.2020.04.003 · Cited by 1,021
Surface-wetting characterization using contact-angle measurements
Huhtamäki, T., Tian, X., Korhonen, J. T., & Ras, R. H. A. (2018) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-018-0003-z · Cited by 965
Multifunctional surface structures of plants: An inspiration for biomimetics
Koch, K., Bhushan, B., & Barthlott, W. (2009) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.07.003 · Cited by 934
Nanoparticle-Based Sustainable Agriculture and Food Science: Recent Advances and Future Outlook
Mittal, D., Kaur, G., Singh, P., Yadav, K., & Ali, S. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Nanotechnology · doi:10.3389/fnano.2020.579954 · Cited by 788
Diefendorf, A. F., & Freimuth, E. J. (2017) · Organic Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.orggeochem.2016.10.016 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Riederer, M., & Schreiber, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-10-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 363
- Pages
- 2023-2032
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2107163124
- Cited by
- 979
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protecting against water loss: analysis of the barrier properties of plant cuticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jexbot/52.363.2023
- The paper
- Riederer, M., & Schreiber, L. (2001). Protecting against water loss: analysis of the barrier properties of plant cuticles. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/52.363.2023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.