The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The exodermis: a variable apoplastic barrier
Open accessAbstract
The exodermis (hypodermis with Casparian bands) of plant roots represents a barrier of variable resistance to the radial flow of both water and solutes and may contribute substantially to the overall resistance. The variability is a result largely of changes in structure and anatomy of developing roots. The extent and rate at which apoplastic exodermal barriers (Casparian bands and suberin lamellae) are laid down in radial transverse and tangential walls depends on the response to conditions in a given habitat such as drought, anoxia, salinity, heavy metal or nutrient stresses. As Casparian bands and suberin lamellae form in the exodermis, the permeability to water and solutes is differentially reduced. Apoplastic barriers do not function in an all-or-none fashion. Rather, they exhibit a selectivity pattern which is useful for the plant and provides an adaptive mechanism under given circumstances. This is demonstrated for the apoplastic passage of water which appears to have an unusually high mobility, ions, the apoplastic tracer PTS, and the stress hormone ABA. Results of permeation properties of apoplastic barriers are related to their chemical composition. Depending on the growth regime (e.g. stresses applied) barriers contain aliphatic and aromatic suberin and lignin in different amounts and proportion. It is concluded that, by regulating the extent of apoplastic barriers and their chemical composition, plants can effectively regulate the uptake or loss of water and solutes. Compared with the uptake by root membranes (symplastic and transcellular pathways), which is under metabolic control, this appears to be an additional or compensatory strategy of plants to acquire water and solutes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Root responses to cadmium in the rhizosphere: a review
Lux, A., Martinka, M., Vaculik, M., & White, P. J. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erq281 · Cited by 1,100
Root biology and genetic improvement for drought avoidance in rice
Gowda, V. R. P., Henry, A., Yamauchi, A., Shashidhar, H. E., & Serraj, R. (2011) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2011.03.001 · Cited by 465
Baxter, I., Hosmani, P. S., Rus, A., Lahner, B., Borevitz, J. O., Muthukumar, B., Mickelbart, M. V., Schreiber, L., Franke, R. B., & Salt, D. E. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000492 · Cited by 342
Self-citationCharacterisation of a pine MYB that regulates lignification
Patzlaff, A., McInnis, S., Courtenay, A., Surman, C., Newman, L. J., Smith, C., Bevan, M. W., Mansfield, S., Whetten, R. W., Sederoff, R. R., et al. (2003) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01916.x · Cited by 332
Suberin — a biopolyester forming apoplastic plant interfaces
Franke, R., & Schreiber, L. (2007) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.004 · Cited by 323
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hose, E., Clarkson, D. T., Steudle, E., Schreiber, L., & Hartung, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-12-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 365
- Pages
- 2245-2264
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2159510103
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The exodermis: a variable apoplastic barrier. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jexbot/52.365.2245
- The paper
- Hose, E., Clarkson, D. T., Steudle, E., Schreiber, L., & Hartung, W. (2001). The exodermis: a variable apoplastic barrier. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/52.365.2245
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.