The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determining critical pre‐ and post‐anthesis periods and physiological processes in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. exposed to moderately elevated temperatures
Open accessAbstract
To determine the thermosensitive periods and physiological processes in tomato flowers exposed to moderately elevated temperatures, tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill., cv. NC 8288) were grown at 28/22 degrees C or 32/26 degrees C day/night temperature regimes and then transferred to the opposite regime for 0-15 d before or 0-24 h after anthesis. For plants initially grown at 28/22 degrees C, moderate temperature stress before anthesis decreased the percentage of fruit set per plant, but did not clarify the thermosensitive period. The same level of stress did not significantly reduce fruit set when applied immediately after anthesis. For plants initially grown at 32/26 degrees C, fruit set was completely prevented unless a relief period of more than 5 d was provided before anthesis. The same level of stress relief for 3-24 h after anthesis also increased fruit set. Plants were most sensitive to 32/26 degrees C temperatures 7-15 d before anthesis. Microscopic investigation of anthers in plants grown continuously at high temperature indicated disruption of development in the pollen, endothecium, epidermis, and stomium. This disruption was reduced, but still observable in plants relieved from high temperature for 10 d before anthesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of water deficit on sporogenesis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
SAINI, H. S., & ASPINALL, D. (1981) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a086170 · Cited by 188
Cited by
DE STORME, N., & GEELEN, D. (2014) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12142 · Cited by 476
PRESSMAN, E. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf240 · Cited by 384
Impact of Environmental Factors on Product Quality of Greenhouse Vegetables for Fresh Consumption
Gruda, N. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352680591008628 · Cited by 373
Muhlemann, J. K., Younts, T. L. B., & Muday, G. K. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1811492115 · Cited by 367
Perspectives on deciphering mechanisms underlying plant heat stress response and thermotolerance
Bokszczanin, K. (2013) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00315 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Sato, S., Peet, M. M., & Thomas, J. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-05-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 371
- Pages
- 1187-1195
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2122874877
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determining critical pre‐ and post‐anthesis periods and physiological processes in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. exposed to moderately elevated temperatures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jexbot/53.371.1187
- The paper
- Sato, S., Peet, M. M., & Thomas, J. F. (2002). Determining critical pre‐ and post‐anthesis periods and physiological processes in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. exposed to moderately elevated temperatures. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/53.371.1187
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.