Cited by 6Medical History and InnovationsHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesGlobal Maternal and Child Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Measurement of Maternal Mortality

LOUDON, I.·1999·Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences

Abstract

IRVINE LOUDON; The Measurement of Maternal Mortality, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Volume 54, Issue 2, 1 April 1999, Pages 312–329, h

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jhmas/54.2.312

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 6

Metadata

Authors
LOUDON, I.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
LOUDON, I.
Venue
Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences
Published
1999-04-01
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
312-329
ISSN
  • 0022-5045 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4373
OpenAlex
W2089009722
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medical History and Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
maternal mortality, mortality measurement, history of obstetrics, history of public health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Epidemiologic Methods, Humans, Maternal Mortality, Global Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review