CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 34Migration and Exile StudiesMigration, Racism, and Human RightsMigration, Refugees, and Integration

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

‘Over-researched’ and ‘Under-researched’ refugee groups: Exploring the phenomena, causes and consequences

Omata, Naohiko·2021·Journal of Human Rights Practice
DOI 10.1093/jhuman/huaa049
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Summary: Drawing upon my fieldwork experience in East Africa, this article sheds light on emerging phenomena of ‘over-researched’ and ‘under-researched’ refugee populations. Over the past years, I have increasingly encountered ‘research fatigue’ amongst certain groups of refugees who have undergone frequent studies by numerous researchers. On the other hand, I have also noticed disappointment and frustration from groups of refugees who feel that they remain ‘under-studied’ despite their hidden challenges and vulnerabilities. While the phenomena of over- and under-research are not new, few studies are done to compare the under- and over-studied refugees and to investigate the causes and consequences of the polarisation of research interest amongst refugee populations. This article thus aims to narrow these gaps and also explores these phenomena in relation to accountability and ethics related to forced migration scholarship. I also present practical actions toward improvement of this research polarisation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jhuman/huaa049

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Al-Hardan, 2014, Decolonizing Research on Palestinians: Towards Critical Epistemologies and Research Practices, Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 61, 10.1177/1077800413508534 · DOI
  2. 2018, The State of the Humanitarian System
  3. Anderson, 1999, Do No Harm: How Aid Can Support Peace—or War, 10.1515/9781685854065 · DOI
  4. Bakewell, 2008, Research Beyond the Categories: The Importance of Policy Irrelevant Research into Forced Migration, Journal of Refugee Studies, 21, 432, 10.1093/jrs/fen042 · DOI
  5. Ballinger, 2012, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, 3
  6. Bloch, 2020, Reflections and Directions for Research in Refugee Studies, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 43, 436, 10.1080/01419870.2020.1677928 · DOI
  7. Bolzman, 2014, The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies, 409
  8. Clark, 2008, ‘We’re Over-Researched Here!’ Exploring Accounts of Research Fatigue within, Qualitative Research Engagements., 42, 953
  9. Cole, 2018, Beyond Labelling: Rethinking the Role and Value of the Refugee ‘Label’ through Semiotics, Journal of Refugee Studies, 31, 1, 10.1093/jrs/fex021 · DOI
  10. Crisp, 2018, A Global Academic Network on Refugees: Some Unanswered Questions, International Journal of Refugee Law, 30, 640, 10.1093/ijrl/eey050 · DOI
  11. Davis, 2007, Humanitarian Practice Network
  12. Dudai, 2019, The Study of Human Rights Practice: State of the Art, Journal of Human Rights Practice, 11, 273, 10.1093/jhuman/huz027 · DOI
  13. Fassin, 2007, Humanitarianism as a Politics of Life, Public Culture, 19, 499, 10.1215/08992363-2007-007 · DOI
  14. Gatrell, 2017, Refugees—What’s Wrong with History?, Journal of Refugee Studies, 30, 170
  15. Goodhand, 2000, Research in Conflict Zones: Ethics and Accountability, Forced Migration Review, 8, 12
  16. Hale, 2006, Activist Research v. Cultural Critique: Indigenous Land Rights and the Contradictions of Politically Engaged Anthropology, Cultural Anthropology, 21, 96, 10.1525/can.2006.21.1.96 · DOI
  17. Hammett, 2019, The Ethics of (Not) Giving Back, Area, 51, 380, 10.1111/area.12471 · DOI
  18. Harrell-Bond, 2005, Rights in Exile: Janus-Faced Humanitarianism
  19. Harrell-Bond, 2007, In Search of ‘Invisible’ Actors: Barriers to Access in Refugee Research, Journal of Refugee Studies, 20, 281, 10.1093/jrs/fem015 · DOI
  20. Hugman, 2011, When ‘Do No Harm’ Is Not Enough: The Ethics of Research with Refugees and Other Vulnerable Groups, British Journal of Social Work, 41, 1271, 10.1093/bjsw/bcr013 · DOI
  21. Jacobsen, 2003, The Dual Imperative in Refugee Research: Some Methodological and Ethical Considerations in Research on Forced Migration, Disasters, 27, 185, 10.1111/1467-7717.00228 · DOI
  22. Landau, 2007, Can We Talk and Is Anybody Listening? Reflections on IASFM 10, Talking Across Borders: New Dialogues in Forced Migration, Journal of Refugee Studies, 20, 335, 10.1093/jrs/fem028 · DOI
  23. Leaning, 2001, Ethics of Research in Refugee Populations, The Lancet, 357, 1432, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04572-4 · DOI
  24. Mackenzie, 2007, Beyond ‘Do No Harm’: The Challenge of Constructing Ethical Relationships in Refugee Research, Journal of Refugee Studies, 20, 299, 10.1093/jrs/fem008 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Mirza, 2014, The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies, 420
  26. Pittaway, 2010, Stop Stealing Our Stories’: The Ethics of Research with Vulnerable Groups, Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2, 229, 10.1093/jhuman/huq004 · DOI
  27. Polzer, 2008, Invisible Displacement, Journal of Refugee Studies, 21, 417, 10.1093/jrs/fen045 · DOI
  28. Scalettaris, 2007, Refugee Studies and the International Refugee Regime: A Reflection on a Desirable Separation, Refugee Survey Quarterly, 26, 36, 10.1093/rsq/hdi0241 · DOI
  29. Schmidt, 2007, ‘I Know What You’re Doing’: Reflexivity and Methods in Refugee Studies, Refugee Survey Quarterly, 26, 82, 10.1093/rsq/hdi0245 · DOI
  30. Sukarieh, 2012, On the Problem of Over-Researched Communities: The Case of the Shatila Palestinian Refugee Camp in Lebanon, Sociology, 47, 494, 10.1177/0038038512448567 · DOI
  31. Van Hear, 1998, Editorial Introduction, Journal of Refugee Studies, 11, 341, 10.1093/jrs/11.4.341 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Omata, N.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Omata, Naohiko
ORCID
Omata, Naohiko
Venue
Journal of Human Rights Practice
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2020-11-01
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
681-695
ISSN
  • 1757-9619 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-9627
DOI
10.1093/jhuman/huaa049
OpenAlex
W3119822832
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
Locations
Journal of Human Rights Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Keywords
refugee studies, research fatigue, research ethics, research accountability, refugee vulnerability, East Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review