The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Another Digital Divide: The Rise of Data Realms and its Implications for the WTO
Abstract
Individuals, businesses, and governments increasingly use data to create new services delivered via the internet. In so doing, they are creating a new economy built on cross-border data flows. The USA, the European Union, and China are using domestic and foreign policies to reap data-based economies of scale and scope. Essentially, they have created three distinct data realms with different approaches to data governance. As a result, they have fostered a new digital divide: between the three data behemoths and other countries that are rule takers. This situation presents the WTO with a challenge and an opportunity. These three data realms could undermine the ability of the WTO to govern trade in data flows, but it also creates pressures for the three data realms to use WTO mechanisms to find common ground among their approaches. Moreover, it could provide an incentive to WTO members to create new rules governing trade in data.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The world has not yet formed a unified digital governance rules framework (Aaronson & Leblond, 2018, p. 253).”
From China’s Digital Silk Road in the Age of the Digital Economy: Political Analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Aaronson & Leblond, 2018, p. 253
Citations
Cited by
China’s Digital Silk Road in the Age of the Digital Economy: Political Analysis
Cheng, G. (2022) · Vestnik RUDN International Relations · doi:10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-2-271-287 · Cited by 20
“The world has not yet formed a unified digital governance rules framework (Aaronson & Leblond, 2018, p. 253).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Aaronson, S. A., & Leblond, P.
- Affiliations
- George Washington University (US)
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Leblond, Patrick
- Venue
- Journal of International Economic Law
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-05-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 245-272
- ISSN
- 1369-3034 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3758
- OpenAlex
- W2804028532
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 65.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of International Economic Law (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- The George Washington University Institute of International Economic Policy
- University of Ottawa's
- Tellier Chair on Business and Public Policy
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Trade Organization Law
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Law › Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
- Keywords
- digital divide, cross-border data flows, World Trade Organization, data governance, data sovereignty, trade policy, online services, United States, European Union, China
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Another Digital Divide: The Rise of Data Realms and its Implications for the WTO. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jiel/jgy019
- The paper
- Aaronson, S. A., & Leblond, P. (2018). Another Digital Divide: The Rise of Data Realms and its Implications for the WTO. Journal of International Economic Law. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgy019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.