The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The WTO Dispute Settlement System: The First Ten Years
Abstract
This paper reviews the operation of the WTO’s dispute settlement system during its first ten years – from 1995 to 2004. After a brief overview of the system, the experience of several major users of the system – the United States, the European Communities, Canada, Japan, Brazil and India – is examined and an evaluation is made in terms of how they have fared in advancing their major trade policy concerns on a subject matter and a country-by-country basis. Particular attention is paid to certain bilateral relationships, such as that of the United States and the EC. The paper then evaluates the system’s success in settling disputes, in terms of whether disputes have been settled promptly, either through mutually agreed solutions or through implementation of panel/Appellate Body reports. The paper concludes that since its inception in 1995, the system has worked reasonably well in providing a reasonably effective mechanism through which WTO Members are able to resolve disputes, both at the consultation stage and following completion of formal dispute settlement proceedings. The system has not, however, achieved its goal of promptness in many cases.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It effectively dealt with most of the controversial cases or issues in the GATT system that had led to blocked panel reports (i.e., not adopted for lack of consensus). 5”
From WTO Dispute Settlement: Crown Jewel or Costume Jewelry? (2022) · cites this paper as Davey, W.J. (2005) ' The WTO Dispute Settlement System: The First Decade '
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
The Political Economy of the World Trading System: The WTO and Beyond
Hoekman, B. M., & Kostecki, M. M. (2009) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199553761.001.0001 · Cited by 639
Dreher, A., & Voigt, S. (2011) · Journal of Comparative Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jce.2011.04.003 · Cited by 93
Access to Medicines, BRICS Alliances, and Collective Action
Yu, P. K. (2008) · American Journal of Law & Medicine · doi:10.1177/009885880803400210 · Cited by 73
A History of Law and Lawyers in the GATT/WTO
Azevêdo, R. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.30875/cf679d9a-en · Cited by 66
Méndez, M. (2013) · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · Cited by 62
International Court-Curbing in Geneva: Lessons from the Paralysis of the WTO Appellate Body
Pollack, M. A. (2021) · Governance · doi:10.1111/gove.12686 · Cited by 49
Kennedy, M. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316534748 · Cited by 46
Young, A. R. (2005) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/152638005774785435 · Cited by 45
Peritz, L. (2020) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqz094 · Cited by 40
Developing Countries and Global Trade Negotiations
Findlay, C., & Sidorenko, A. (2007) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203962831 · Cited by 36
Waiting for election season: The timing of international trade disputes
Pervez, F. (2015) · The Review of International Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11558-015-9221-0 · Cited by 28
Dreher, A., & Voigt, S. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1121294 · Cited by 28
Compliance with WTO Dispute RulingsPreprint
Spilker, G. (2013) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 27
STRENGTHENING MULTILATERALISM: A MAPPING OF PROPOSALS ON WTO REFORM AND GLOBAL TRADE GOVERNANCEPreprint
Deere-Birkbeck, C., Monagle, C., Meléndez‐Ortiz, R., & Marchi, S. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 23
Hakikat Hukum Ekonomi (Internasional) Dalam Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat
Kameo, J., & Prasetyo, T. (2020) · JURNAL HUKUM IUS QUIA IUSTUM · doi:10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss2.art5 · Cited by 21
WTO Dispute Settlement: Crown Jewel or Costume Jewelry?
Davey, W. J. (2022) · World Trade Review · doi:10.1017/s1474745622000106 · Cited by 20
Self-citationWTO Judicial Politics and EU Trade Policy: Business Associations as Vessels of Special Interest?
Poletti, A., Biévre, D. D., & Hanegraaff, M. (2015) · The British Journal of Politics and International Relations · doi:10.1111/1467-856x.12071 · Cited by 20
WTO remedies and developing countries
Pfumorodze, J. (2011) · Journal of International Trade Law and Policy · doi:10.1108/14770021111116151 · Cited by 19
The US–Canada softwood lumber dispute and the WTO definition of subsidy
Gagné, G., & ROCH, F. (2008) · World Trade Review · doi:10.1017/s1474745608003972 · Cited by 18
The Legal Effects of EU Agreements
Méndez, M. (2013) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606610.001.0001 · Cited by 15
Winning at the WTO: the development of a trade policy community within Brazil
Shaffer, G., Badin, M. R. S., & Rosenberg, B. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511663192.003 · Cited by 14
How Do Third Parties Affect Compliance in the Trade Regime?
Kucik, J., & Peritz, L. (2020) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/711058 · Cited by 14
Legalization and Compliance: How Judicial Activity Undercuts the Global Trade Regime
Kucik, J., Peritz, L., & Puig, S. (2022) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123422000163 · Cited by 13
Should There Be New Multilateral Rules for Digital Trade?
Burri, M. (2013) · BORIS (University Library Bern) · doi:10.7892/boris.52485 · Cited by 13
Building Intellectual Property Coalitions for Development
Yu, P. K. (2009) · Wilfrid Laurier University Press eBooks · doi:10.51644/9781554581641-010 · Cited by 12
The WTO Dispute Settlement System: How Have Developing Countries Fared?
Davey, W. J. (2010) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230250826_11 · Cited by 11
Self-citationThe politics of rejection: Explaining Chinese import refusals
Kim, S. E., Perlman, R., & Zeng, G. (2024) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12883 · Cited by 10
Santos, Á. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139381888.008 · Cited by 10
The United States and the WTO Dispute Settlement System
Lawrence, R. Z. (2007) · Cited by 10
Urban and Rural Dimensions of Income Inequality in Vietnam
Odano, S., & Abedin, Z. (2008) · Economics & management series · Cited by 9
Jurisprudential developments on the purpose of WTO suspension of obligations
Tijmes‐Ihl, J. (2013) · World Trade Review · doi:10.1017/s1474745613000177 · Cited by 8
Transatlantic Trade Dispute: Solution for Airbus-Boeing Under Biden?
Wittig, S. (2021) · Intereconomics · doi:10.1007/s10272-021-0947-z · Cited by 8
Emerging Powers, Domestic Politics, and wto Dispute Settlement Reform
Mahrenbach, L. C. (2016) · International Negotiation · doi:10.1163/15718069-12341332 · Cited by 8
Governing Climate Change: Lessons from other Governance Regimes
Ghosh, A., & Woods, N. (2009) · Econstor (Econstor) · Cited by 8
Nature and Enforceability of WTO-plus SPS and TBT Provisions in Canada's PTAs: FromNAFTAtoCETA
Puig, G. V., & DALKE, E. D. (2015) · World Trade Review · doi:10.1017/s1474745615000464 · Cited by 7
Securing the Supply Chain: Does the Container Security Initiative Comply with WTO Law?
Dallimore, C. (2008) · URN:NBN Resolver for Germany & Switzerland (German National Library) · Cited by 7
Globalization and the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism: Making a Rules-based Trading Regime Work
Khan, H. A., & Liu, Y. (2008) · Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich) · Cited by 6
Anatomy of trade disputes: mapping patterns and trends of WTO dispute initiations (1995–2023)
Yaseen, I., & Sofi, M. S. (2024) · DECISION · doi:10.1007/s40622-024-00411-1 · Cited by 4
Intellectual Property Negotiations, the BRICS Factor and the Changing North–South Debate
Yu, P. K. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108236102.008 · Cited by 4
Hoekman, B. M., & Kostecki, M. M. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199553761.003.0002 · Cited by 4
Birkbeck, C. D. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2195875 · Cited by 4
The first years of WTO dispute settlement: Dealing with controversy and building confidence
Davey, W. J. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316048160.028 · Cited by 3
Self-citationAken, W. V., & Artige, L. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2202787 · Cited by 3
Agon, S. S. (2016) · World Trade Review · doi:10.1017/s147474561600001x · Cited by 2
Introduction: Digital technologies and international trade regulation
Burri, M., & Cottier, T. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139136716.002 · Cited by 2
Bilateral Free Trade Agreements: A Critical Assessment and WTO Regulatory Reform ProposalPreprint
Folsom, R. H. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1262872 · Cited by 2
Kirsch, A., & Pouch, T. (2025) · Revue de l'OFCE/La Revue de l'OFCE · doi:10.3917/reof.188.0069 · Cited by 1
Burda, J. (2020) · Revue québécoise de droit international · doi:10.7202/1069148ar · Cited by 1
Assessing the success of the WTO DSM: Lessons from softwood lumber IV
Williams, R. A. (2010) · Canadian Foreign Policy Journal · doi:10.1080/11926422.2010.9687291 · Cited by 1
Regulatory Innovation and the Institutional Design of the TRIPS Agreement
Podszun, R., & Franz, B. (2016) · MPI studies on intellectual property and competition law · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48107-3_9 · Cited by 1
Kennedy, M. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316534748.004 · Cited by 1
THE EXHAUSTION OF COOLING-OFF PERIOD: A NON-MANDATORY PRE-CONDITION IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION
Belaputri, A., Manogar, G. J., Febria, J., & Marwandy, M. I. (2021) · TRANSNATIONAL BUSINESS LAW JOURNAL · doi:10.23920/transbuslj.v2i2.788 · Cited by 1
Improvement of the WTO Dispute Settlement System Effectiveness and the Monetary Compensation
de Oliveira, L. M. B. (2023) · Revista Justiça do Direito · doi:10.5335/rjd.v37i1.14254 · Cited by 1
Protection Of Intellectual Property
Hoekman, B. M., & Kostecki, M. M. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199553761.003.0008 · Cited by 1
Does the United States Support International Tribunals? The Case of the Multilateral Trade System
Dunoff, J. L. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511819759.011 · Cited by 1
Medidas antidumping: devido processo legal à luz das regras da OMC
Kramer, C. (2012) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.2.2012.tde-14062013-133021 · Cited by 1
Hagiwara, K. (2013) · uO Research (University of Ottawa) · doi:10.20381/ruor-3178 · Cited by 1
Countersuits and the Politics of Abandoned WTO Trade DisputesPreprint
Pervez, F. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2452620 · Cited by 1
Petryshyn, A. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4970546 · Cited by 1
Sourcing Under Pressure: Geoeconomic Risk, Firm Dependence, and the US-China Trade Conflict
Hassan, J. (2025) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.29177102 · Cited by 1
BC SAWMILLS UNDER SIEGE: INDUSTRY RESPONSES TO THE U S-CANADA SOFTWOOD LUMBER DISPUTE 2001-2008
Midgley, R. (2010) · Summit (Simon Fraser University)
Making a Rules-Based Trading Regime Work: Globalization and the WTO Dispute Settlement MechanismPreprint
Khan, H. A., & Liu, Y. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.995933
Medrado, R. G. D. S. (2011) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.2.2011.tde-25052012-141737
WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding Remedies Reforms: An African PerspectivePreprint
Oduwole, J. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2119857
Birkbeck, C. D. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511996221.022
Bonavita, V. (2012) · AMS Dottorato Institutional Doctoral Theses Repository (University of Bologna) · doi:10.6092/unibo/amsdottorato/4716
EFFECTIVENESS OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION’S DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM
Alfaqiih, A. (2014) · Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada · doi:10.22146/jmh.16075
Justice, authority, and the world order
Walton, A. (2009) · Journal of Global Ethics · doi:10.1080/17449620903403317
Cross-retaliation in IP rights: addressing member asymmetries and compliance at the WTO
Amaral, R. V. (2012) · Research Publications (Maastricht University) · doi:10.26481/dis.20120330rv
Elections and The Timing of Trade Disputes
Pervez, F. (2014)
Retaliation under the WTO Agreement: The “Sequencing Problem”
Gorbylev, S., & Novaković, M. (2013) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.159562
From GATT to WTO: The Legalization of Compliance Procedures in Trade Dispute Settlement System
Ma, G., & Li, J. (2015) · China and WTO Review · doi:10.14330/cwr.2015.1.1.02
Legal Regime for Preferential Services Trade
Sieber-Gasser, C. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316569412.010
Loopholes in the GATS: Problems in Practice
Sieber-Gasser, C. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316569412.015
Chapter 15 WTO DSU-Enforcement Issues
Pelzman, J., & Shoham, A. (2009) · Frontiers of economics and globalisation · doi:10.1108/s1574-8715(2009)0000006018
Analysis of Japan's RTA and WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism
Sato, S. A. (2016) · DigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University)
Elias, F. L. F. (2018) · Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFMG · doi:10.12818/p.0304-2340.2018v73p251
Building IPC4D to promote access to essential medicines
Yu, P. K. (2013) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781849804929.00015
The Role of Non-governmental Organisations Acting as Amicus Curiae in WTO
Yan, S. (2022) · Applied Science and Innovative Research · doi:10.22158/asir.v6n2p26
Small States and the Multilateral Trading System
Secretariat, C. (2015) · OECD eBooks · doi:10.14217/9781848599338-en
Liao, J. C. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137489562_1
Limenta, M. (2012) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.16993588.v1
Kennedy, M. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316534748.003
Hoekman, B. M., & Kostecki, M. M. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199553761.003.0004
Dispute Settlement And Enforcement Of Rules
Hoekman, B. M., & Kostecki, M. M. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199553761.003.0003
Hoekman, B. M., & Kostecki, M. M. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199553761.003.0007
The Trading System In Perspective
Hoekman, B. M., & Kostecki, M. M. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199553761.003.0001
Hoekman, B. M., & Kostecki, M. M. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199553761.005.0001
Sector-Specific Multilateral Trade Agreements
Hoekman, B. M., & Kostecki, M. M. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199553761.003.0006
The Economics Of Trade Policy—Basic Concepts
Hoekman, B. M., & Kostecki, M. M. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199553761.005.0002
Hoekman, B. M., & Kostecki, M. M. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199553761.003.0005
Hoekman, B. M., & Kostecki, M. M. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199553761.002.0005
Hoekman, B. M., & Kostecki, M. M. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199553761.003.0011
Hoekman, B. M., & Kostecki, M. M. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199553761.002.0006
Preferential Trade Agreements and Regional Integration
Hoekman, B. M., & Kostecki, M. M. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199553761.003.0010
Metadata
- Authors
- Davey, W. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Davey, William J.
- Venue
- Journal of International Economic Law
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-01-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-50
- ISSN
- 1369-3034 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3758
- OpenAlex
- W2045746954
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 21.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of International Economic Law (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Trade Organization Law
- Social Sciences › Law › International Arbitration and Investment Law
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
- Keywords
- WTO dispute settlement, WTO Appellate Body, panel reports, international trade law
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.