The DOI matches its Crossref record.
AI-generated works and copyright law: towards a union of strange bedfellows
Abstract
Copyright law vests in original works of authorship.1 However, most European Union (EU) copyright instruments do not clearly specify whether an ‘author’ is a natural and/or legal person.2 EU Member States have also adopted divergent interpretations of ‘authorship’. Though it appears that there might be a preference for the definition of an author as a natural person,3 this approach might not adequately reflect technological realities since copyright works are no longer the exclusive reserve of natural persons. This is particularly because AI systems are now (either autonomously or with human input) capable of creating works which would ordinarily have been eligible for copyright protection had they been created by natural persons. Owing to reasons which include the above, AI-generated works may not be subject to copyright protection in most EU countries and this might affect the incentivization of creatives.4 ...
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The training of LLMs and widespread use of GenAI has revealed a set of complex and evolving legal challenges surrounding the use of GenAI technologies, particularly concerning copyright and the notion of authorship (Bonadio et al., 2022a;Salami, 2021).”
From Redefining boundaries in innovation and knowledge domains: Investigating the impact of generative artificial intelligence on copyright and intellectual property rights (2024) · cites this paper as Salami, 2021
Citations
Cited by
Al-Busaidi, A. S., Raman, R., Hughes, L., Albashrawi, M. A., Malik, T., Dwivedi, Y. K., Al- Alawi, T., AlRizeiqi, M., Davies, G., Fenwick, M., et al. (2024) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2024.100630 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Salami, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-11-29
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 124-135
- ISSN
- 1747-1532
- 1747-1540
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review