Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

AI-generated works and copyright law: towards a union of strange bedfellows

Salami, Emmanuel·2021·Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice

Abstract

Copyright law vests in original works of authorship.1 However, most European Union (EU) copyright instruments do not clearly specify whether an ‘author’ is a natural and/or legal person.2 EU Member States have also adopted divergent interpretations of ‘authorship’. Though it appears that there might be a preference for the definition of an author as a natural person,3 this approach might not adequately reflect technological realities since copyright works are no longer the exclusive reserve of natural persons. This is particularly because AI systems are now (either autonomously or with human input) capable of creating works which would ordinarily have been eligible for copyright protection had they been created by natural persons. Owing to reasons which include the above, AI-generated works may not be subject to copyright protection in most EU countries and this might affect the incentivization of creatives.4 ...

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa189

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Salami, E.
Venue
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
Published
2020-11-29
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
124-135
ISSN
  • 1747-1532
  • 1747-1540
Cited by
15
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review