The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Autoregressive Conditional Kurtosis
Open accessAbstract
This article proposes a new model for autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity and kurtosis. Via a time-varying degrees of freedom parameter, the conditional variance and conditional kurtosis are permitted to evolve separately. The model uses only the standard Student’s t-density and consequently can be estimated simply using maximum likelihood. The method is applied to a set of four daily financial asset return series comprising U.S. and U.K. stocks and bonds, and significant evidence in favor of the presence of autoregressive conditional kurtosis is observed. Various extensions to the basic model are proposed, and we show that the response of kurtosis to good and bad news is not significantly asymmetric.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Engle, R. F. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912773 · Cited by 20,795
Cited by
GENERALIZED AUTOREGRESSIVE SCORE MODELS WITH APPLICATIONS
Creal, D., Koopman, S. J., & Lucas, A. (2013) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.1279 · Cited by 981
Metadata
- Authors
- Brooks, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Financial Econometrics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-07-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 399-421
- ISSN
- 1479-8409 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-8417
- OpenAlex
- W2163600634
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autoregressive Conditional Kurtosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jjfinec/nbi018
- The paper
- Brooks, C. (2005). Autoregressive Conditional Kurtosis. Journal of Financial Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbi018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.