The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Partial migration or just habitat selection? Seasonal movements of roe deer in an Alpine population
Abstract
The European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) responds to environmental conditions that vary in time and space across its distributional range, generating many different space use patterns. To test the expectation that variation in movement patterns should track changes in environmental conditions, we used the net squared displacement metric to identify the factors shaping observed movement patterns of roe deer in the French Alps. Based on 5 years of data from 25 radiomonitored roe deer (54 individual-years), we found that movements were longest in spring and summer when the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) was higher and shortest in autumn and winter when NDVI was lower and snow cover was present. Roe deer displayed long displacements toward high elevations with gentle slope when the NDVI was higher. The higher quality food resources at higher elevations may have compensated for the energy costs of those movements. Contrary to previous studies on roe deer in mountain ranges, we showed that roe deer movements in the northern French Alps should be interpreted as within home range habitat selection (48 cases; 89%) rather than as partial migration because very few deer (6 cases; 11%) stabilized their activity in distinct home ranges across seasons. Au sein de son aire de répartition, le chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus) rencontre des conditions environnementales variables et contrastées qui engendrent une grande variété de patrons d’utilisation de l’espace. Pour tester…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Slope is known to have an impact on species displacement movement.
“slope is known to have an impact on species displacement movement”
From Omnidirectional and omnifunctional connectivity analyses with a diverse species pool (2020) · cites this paper as Gaudry et al., 2015
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- 10.2307/3545568 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00425.x · DOI
- Beier, 1990, Factors influencing white-tailed deer activity patterns and habitat use, Wildlife Monographs, 109, 3
- 10.1086/667590 · DOI
- 10.5735/086.047.0106 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00481.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01182.x · DOI · Paper page
- Börger, 2012, Quantifying individual differences in dispersal using net squared displacement, 222, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199608898.003.0017 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01776.x · DOI
- Burnham, 2002, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information theoretic approach
- 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19441.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.03.017 · DOI
- Carvalho, 2008, Ranging behaviour of translocated roe deer in a Mediterranean habitat: seasonal and altitudinal influences on home range size and patterns of range use, Mammalia, 72, 89, 10.1515/MAMM.2008.019 · DOI
- Cederlund, 1982, Mobility response of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) to snow depth in a boreal habitat, Swedish Wildlife Research, 12, 37
- 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1989.tb00820.x · DOI
- 10.1139/z03-182 · DOI
- 10.1641/B570206 · DOI
- Duncan, 1998, Feeding strategies and digestive physiology, 91
- 10.1086/285227 · DOI
- 10.1016/0169-5347(88)90166-8 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2010.0085 · DOI
- 10.1890/02-3114 · DOI
- Guillet, 1996, Size of winter home range of roe deer Capreolus capreolus in two forest areas with artificial feeding in Sweden, Wildlife Biology, 2, 107, 10.2981/wlb.1996.039 · DOI
- Hewison, 1998, Social organisation of European roe deer, 189
- 10.1139/z01-032 · DOI
- Holand, 1998, Roe deer in northern environments: physiology and behaviour, 117
- 10.2307/1942661 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1937156 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1156831 · DOI
- Liberg, 1998, Mating system, mating tactics and the function of male territoriality in roe deer, 221
- Linnell, 1998, The European roe deer: a portrait of a successful species, 11
- 10.1139/cjz-2012-0297 · DOI
- 10.1139/z98-230 · DOI
- 10.1111/1365-2656.12105 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00317707 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb01011.x · DOI
- Mysterud, 2012, Contrasting migration tendencies of sympatric red deer and roe deer suggest multiple causes of migration in ungulates, Ecosphere, 3, 1, 10.1890/ES12-00177.1 · DOI
- Mysterud, 1997, Effects of snow depth on food and habitat selection by roe deer Capreolus capreolus along an altitudinal gradient in south-central Norway, Wildlife Biology, 3, 27, 10.2981/wlb.1997.004 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.0021-8790.2001.00559.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0800375105 · DOI
- Neter, 1996, Applied linear statistical models
- 10.2307/1382900 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2010.0095 · DOI
- 10.2307/3801180 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1139/Z10-070 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.011 · DOI
- R Development Core Team, 2013, R: a language and environment for statistical computing
- 10.1139/Z06-210 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0084756 · DOI
- 10.2193/2007-584 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00442-009-1538-z · DOI
- Richard, 2012, Ranging behaviour and excursions of female roe deer during the rut, Behavioural Processes, 79, 28, 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.04.008 · DOI
- 10.2307/3803137 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0952836905007454 · DOI
- 10.2307/1937779 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1995.tb01762.x · DOI
- White, 1990, Analysis of wildlife radiotracking data
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Omnidirectional and omnifunctional connectivity analyses with a diverse species pool
Tessier, D. L., Maranger, R., & Poisot, T. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.02.03.932095 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaudry, W., Saïd, S., Gaillard, J.-M., Chevrier, T., Loison, A., Maillard, D., & Bonenfant, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Mammalogy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-05-13
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 502-510
- ISSN
- 0022-2372
- 1545-1542
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review