Cited by 38

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Partial migration or just habitat selection? Seasonal movements of roe deer in an Alpine population

Gaudry, William, Saïd, Sonia, Gaillard, Jean-Michel, Chevrier, Thierry, Loison, Anne, Maillard, Daniel, Bonenfant, Christophe·2015·Journal of Mammalogy

Abstract

The European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) responds to environmental conditions that vary in time and space across its distributional range, generating many different space use patterns. To test the expectation that variation in movement patterns should track changes in environmental conditions, we used the net squared displacement metric to identify the factors shaping observed movement patterns of roe deer in the French Alps. Based on 5 years of data from 25 radiomonitored roe deer (54 individual-years), we found that movements were longest in spring and summer when the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) was higher and shortest in autumn and winter when NDVI was lower and snow cover was present. Roe deer displayed long displacements toward high elevations with gentle slope when the NDVI was higher. The higher quality food resources at higher elevations may have compensated for the energy costs of those movements. Contrary to previous studies on roe deer in mountain ranges, we showed that roe deer movements in the northern French Alps should be interpreted as within home range habitat selection (48 cases; 89%) rather than as partial migration because very few deer (6 cases; 11%) stabilized their activity in distinct home ranges across seasons. Au sein de son aire de répartition, le chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus) rencontre des conditions environnementales variables et contrastées qui engendrent une grande variété de patrons d’utilisation de l’espace. Pour tester…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jmammal/gyv055

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. 10.2307/3545568 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00425.x · DOI
  3. Beier, 1990, Factors influencing white-tailed deer activity patterns and habitat use, Wildlife Monographs, 109, 3
  4. 10.1086/667590 · DOI
  5. 10.5735/086.047.0106 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00481.x · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01182.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. Börger, 2012, Quantifying individual differences in dispersal using net squared displacement, 222, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199608898.003.0017 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01776.x · DOI
  10. Burnham, 2002, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information theoretic approach
  11. 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19441.x · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.03.017 · DOI
  13. Carvalho, 2008, Ranging behaviour of translocated roe deer in a Mediterranean habitat: seasonal and altitudinal influences on home range size and patterns of range use, Mammalia, 72, 89, 10.1515/MAMM.2008.019 · DOI
  14. Cederlund, 1982, Mobility response of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) to snow depth in a boreal habitat, Swedish Wildlife Research, 12, 37
  15. 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1989.tb00820.x · DOI
  16. 10.1139/z03-182 · DOI
  17. 10.1641/B570206 · DOI
  18. Duncan, 1998, Feeding strategies and digestive physiology, 91
  19. 10.1086/285227 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/0169-5347(88)90166-8 · DOI
  21. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0085 · DOI
  22. 10.1890/02-3114 · DOI
  23. Guillet, 1996, Size of winter home range of roe deer Capreolus capreolus in two forest areas with artificial feeding in Sweden, Wildlife Biology, 2, 107, 10.2981/wlb.1996.039 · DOI
  24. Hewison, 1998, Social organisation of European roe deer, 189
  25. 10.1139/z01-032 · DOI
  26. Holand, 1998, Roe deer in northern environments: physiology and behaviour, 117
  27. 10.2307/1942661 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.2307/1937156 · DOI
  29. 10.1126/science.1156831 · DOI
  30. Liberg, 1998, Mating system, mating tactics and the function of male territoriality in roe deer, 221
  31. Linnell, 1998, The European roe deer: a portrait of a successful species, 11
  32. 10.1139/cjz-2012-0297 · DOI
  33. 10.1139/z98-230 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/1365-2656.12105 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/BF00317707 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb01011.x · DOI
  37. Mysterud, 2012, Contrasting migration tendencies of sympatric red deer and roe deer suggest multiple causes of migration in ungulates, Ecosphere, 3, 1, 10.1890/ES12-00177.1 · DOI
  38. Mysterud, 1997, Effects of snow depth on food and habitat selection by roe deer Capreolus capreolus along an altitudinal gradient in south-central Norway, Wildlife Biology, 3, 27, 10.2981/wlb.1997.004 · DOI
  39. 10.1046/j.0021-8790.2001.00559.x · DOI
  40. 10.1073/pnas.0800375105 · DOI
  41. Neter, 1996, Applied linear statistical models
  42. 10.2307/1382900 · DOI
  43. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0095 · DOI
  44. 10.2307/3801180 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1139/Z10-070 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.011 · DOI
  47. R Development Core Team, 2013, R: a language and environment for statistical computing
  48. 10.1139/Z06-210 · DOI
  49. 10.1371/journal.pone.0084756 · DOI
  50. 10.2193/2007-584 · DOI
  51. 10.1007/s00442-009-1538-z · DOI
  52. Richard, 2012, Ranging behaviour and excursions of female roe deer during the rut, Behavioural Processes, 79, 28, 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.04.008 · DOI
  53. 10.2307/3803137 · DOI
  54. 10.1017/S0952836905007454 · DOI
  55. 10.2307/1937779 · DOI
  56. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1995.tb01762.x · DOI
  57. White, 1990, Analysis of wildlife radiotracking data

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gaudry, W., Saïd, S., Gaillard, J.-M., Chevrier, T., Loison, A., Maillard, D., & Bonenfant, C.
Venue
Journal of Mammalogy
Published
2015-05-13
Volume
96
Issue
3
Pages
502-510
ISSN
  • 0022-2372
  • 1545-1542
Cited by
38
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review