Cited by 257Mosquito-borne diseases and controlDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorMalaria Research and Control

REVIEW ARTICLE1: Host-Feeding Patterns of Mosquitoes, with a Review of Advances in Analysis of Blood Meals by Serology2

Tempelis, C. H.·1975·Journal of Medical Entomology

Abstract

In evaluating the host ranges of mosquitoes, 9 basic feeding patterns emerge. There are mosquito species that feed (1) almost entirely on mammals, e.g., anopheline mosquitoes, Culiseta inornata; (2) almost entirely on birds, e.g., Culiseta melanura, Culex pens; (3) readily on both birds and mammals, e.g., Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus; (4) almost exclusively on amphibians, e.g., Culex territans; (5) predominantly on reptiles but will take an occasional blood meal from a homeothermic animal, e.g., Deinocerites dyari; (6) entirely on fish, e.g., Uranotaenia lateralis; (7) readily on both poikilothermic and homeothermic animals, e.g., Deinocerites epitedeus; (8) preferentially on birds in the spring and early summer with a shift to feeding on significant numbers of mammals in the mid and late summer periods, e.g., Culex tarsalis, Culex nigripalpus; (9) almost exclusively on mammals in one geographic area and in another on birds, e.g., Culex erythrothorax. Of the several methods used for determination of host ranges, only advances in serologic technique are discussed in detail. The precipitin test, of which there are several variations currently in use, continues to be the basic serological tool for blood-meal identification. The passive hemagglutination inhibition (PHI) test offers promise as a practical method of distinguishing closely related host species. However, the PHI test is a more elaborate and difficult test when compared with the precipitin test.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jmedent/11.6.635

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tempelis, C. H.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Tempelis, C. H.
Venue
Journal of Medical Entomology
Published
1975-01-10
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
635-653
ISSN
  • 0022-2585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2928
OpenAlex
W2399128786
Cited by
257
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Entomology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Diptera species taxonomy and behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
Keywords
host range, blood meal identification, serology, precipitin test, passive hemagglutination inhibition, mosquito host preference, Culex, Anopheles, Culex tarsalis, Culex quinquefasciatus
MeSH terms
Aedes, Africa, Animals, Anopheles, Birds, Blood, California, Cattle, Chickens, Culex, Feeding Behavior, Immunodiffusion, Hemagglutination Tests, Humans, Immune Sera, India, Insect Vectors, Japan, Mosquito Control, Culicidae, Precipitin Tests, Rabbits, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review