Randomized Clinical Trial of Nutritional Supplementation Shows Little Effect on Functional Status among Free-Living Frail Elderly
Open accessAbstract
Nutritional deficiencies, frequently observed among the frail elderly, have been associated with increased morbidity and dependency. A randomized clinical trial was conducted to assess the impact of nutritional supplementation on the functional status of frail elderly living at home. Subjects (n = 50) over age 60 (mean 78 y) requiring community services and at elevated risk of undernutrition (excessive weight loss or body mass index < 24 kg/m2) were randomized to a high energy nutrient dense supplement provided by a dietitian or a control group receiving visits only. Outcome measures, including changes in handgrip strength, general well-being score, perception of health and number of falls, were measured by an investigator who was unaware of treatment assignment. After 12 wk, weight gain was greater in the supplemented group (2.1 +/- 2.3 vs. 0.6 +/- 1.6 kg; P < 0.01). Despite adequate statistical power, no functional measures differed except that the number of falls was lower among treated subjects vs. controls (0% vs. 21%; P = 0.05). Frail elderly can gain weight through oral supplementation, indicating the reversibility of weight loss in this group, but changes in functional status indicators may require a longer period of supplementation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Greater weight gain is reported in the ONS group than dietary counseling or additional snack foods.
“Greater weight gain (111), higher energy and protein intake (104, 112) and better quality of life (112) are reported in the ONS group than dietary counseling (111, 112) or additional snack foods (113).”
From ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics (2022) · cites this paper as [111]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 26 · Cited by 150
- Authors
- Gray-Donald, K., Payette, H., & Boutier, V.
- Affiliations
- Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
- Venue
- The Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2965-2971
- ISSN
- 0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1889224810
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 1.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
- Keywords
- dietary supplementation, frail elderly, functional status, malnutrition, weight loss, weight gain, grip strength, falls, community-dwelling older adults, nutritional deficiency
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Anthropometry, Carbohydrates, Female, Food, Formulated, Food, Fortified, Health Status, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Weight Gain, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Frail Elderly, Hand Strength, Dietary Sucrose
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review