The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative Nutrient Digestibility in Dogs, Blue Foxes, Mink and Rats
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Experiments involving members of the families Canidae and Mustelidae (Ahlstrøm and Skrede, 1998;Vhile et al., 2005;Ahlstrøm et al., 2003;Gugołek et al., 2013) revealed differences in the gastrointestinal function between wild and farmed animals.”
From Comparative Analysis of Nutrient Digestibility and Nitrogen Retention in Wild and Farmed Canids (2014) · cites this paper as Ahlstrøm and Skrede, 1998
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Ahlstrom, 1995, Comparative nutrient digestibility in blue foxes (Alopexlagopus) and mink (Mustela vison) fed diets with diverging fat:carbohydrate ratios, Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. A Anim. Sci, 45, 74
- Huber, 1986, Variations in digestibility of dry dog foods with identical label guaranteed analysis, J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc, 22, 571
- Kendall, 1982, Comparative evaluation of net digestive and absorptive efficiency in dogs and cats fed a variety of contrasting diet types, J. Small Anim. Pract, 23, 577, 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1982.tb02518.x · DOI
- Stroucken, 1996, Extruding vs pelleting of a feed mixture lowers apparent nitrogen digestibility in dogs, J. Sci. Food Agric, 71, 520, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199608)71:4<520::AID-JSFA612>3.0.CO;2-X · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gugołek, A., Juśkiewicz, J., Strychalski, J., Konstantynowicz, M., & Zwoliński, C. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology · doi:10.1002/jez.1954 · Cited by 18
Comparative Analysis of Nutrient Digestibility and Nitrogen Retention in Wild and Farmed Canids
Gugołek, A., Strychalski, J., Konstantynowicz, M., & Zwoliński, C. (2014) · Annals of Animal Science · doi:10.2478/aoas-2014-0002 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahlstrøm, Ø., & Skrede, A.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
- ORCID
- Ahlstrøm, Øystein
- Venue
- The Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- S2676-S2677
- ISSN
- 0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1863660006
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
- Keywords
- nutrient digestibility, dogs, blue fox, mink, rats, model organisms, feed composition, cross-species comparison, cecal fermentation, hindgut fermentation, beagle dogs, digestibility prediction, cecum, colon, microbial fermentation, monogastric animals
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Dietary Proteins, Digestion, Dogs, Female, Foxes, Male, Mink, Models, Biological, Species Specificity, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Nutrient Digestibility in Dogs, Blue Foxes, Mink and Rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jn/128.12.2676s
- The paper
- Ahlstrøm, Ø., & Skrede, A. (1998). Comparative Nutrient Digestibility in Dogs, Blue Foxes, Mink and Rats. The Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/128.12.2676s
