Environmental influences: factors influencing a woman's decision to use dietary supplements
Open accessAbstract
Use of dietary supplements by women, particularly those over 40 years of age may be widespread in the United Kingdom. However, from surveillance data, there appears to be a disparity between nutrition and health needs and the rationale for and actual use of dietary supplements by women. This apparent paradox forms the basis for an inverse supplement hypothesis (i.e., supplement use in women appears to be most prevalent among those with least need). Little research has been done to examine the factors underlying the decision to use dietary supplements. Reasons for consuming dietary supplements are often complex, combining social, psychological, knowledge and economic factors. The theory of planned behavior is a widely used model for assessing factors influencing behavioral motivation and action that may be useful for assessing specific diet- and nutrition-related practices. It provided the basis for the development of a questionnaire to explore overall dietary supplement use in a cohort of women in the United Kingdom. The analysis of factors related to beliefs underlying dietary supplement use revealed differences between supplement users and nonusers. Differences included a stronger belief by users than nonusers that taking dietary supplements ensures against possible ill health. Both users and nonusers of supplements also perceived the media (books and magazines) to be a powerful influence on a person's decision to use supplements. These findings highlight the potential of the theory of planned behavior in exploring supplement-taking behavior while throwing light on the factors influencing an individual's motivations to use dietary supplements.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The population is increasingly exposed to more information from the media than from the scientific community.
“The population is increasingly exposed to more information from the media than from the scientific community [31,65,69].”
From Intake of nutritional supplements among people exercising in gyms and influencing factors (2010) · cites this paper as [31]
The discussion of normative beliefs (p. 1980S) suggests that books and magazines may influence women's decisions about dietary supplements. It does not measure information exposure, compare media with the scientific community as sources of information, or establish an increasing trend. Searches for those comparisons found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 7 · Cited by 107
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [6]6. Conner, M. & Sparks, P. (1996) The theory of planned behaviour and health behaviours. In: Predicting Health Behaviour: Research and Practice with Social Cognition Models (Conner, M. & Norman, P., eds) pp. 121-162. Bucking- ham, UK, Open University Press.
- [8]8. Woodhouse, A., Calvert, C. & Cade, J. (1997) The UK Women's Cohort Study: background and obtaining local ethical approval. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 56: 64A.
- [10]10. Douglas, R. M., Chalker, E. B. & Treacy, B. (1998) Vitamin C for the common cold. In: Acute Respiratory Infections Module of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Douglas, R., Bridges-Webb, C., Glasziou, P., Lozano, J., Steinhoff, M. & Wang, E., eds), [updated 1 December 1997]. The Cochrane Library; issue 1. Oxford, Update Software.
- [11]11. Kirk, S., Woodhouse, A., & Conner, M. (1998) Beliefs, attitudes and behaviour in relation to supplement use in the UK Women's Cohort Study (UKWCS). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 57: 54A.
- Authors
- Conner, M., Kirk, S. F. L., Cade, J. E., & Barrett, J. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Conner, Mark
- Venue
- The Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1978S-1982S
- ISSN
- 0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2153168298
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- Office of Dietary Supplements
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- March of Dimes Foundation
- Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
- National Institutes of Health
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Agricultural Research Service
- World Cancer Research Fund
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- Office of Research on Women's Health
- Office of Women's Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
- Keywords
- dietary supplements, women, theory of planned behavior, health beliefs, media influence, older women, nutrient requirements
- MeSH terms
- Choice Behavior, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Models, Psychological, Social Environment, Cohort Studies, Dietary Supplements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review