The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Further Observations on the Chromosomes of Chinese Hamster Cells in Tissue Culture 2
Abstract
The chromosome complements of 3 Chinese hamster cell strains and a methylcholanthrene-treated subline varied during observation periods of 12 to 22 months. The complements were formed basically from multiples of the haploid constitution, and in 1 strain the normal diploid complement persisted as the predominant pattern for many months. Abnormalities of varying types began to appear soon after a culture was initiated, and in some sublines particular abnormal chromosome patterns persisted for many months, while in others variation was continuous. Except in the rare, markedly polyploid and partially disintegrated metaphases, the normal morphology of the individual chromosomes was usually maintained. Thus the metaphase chromosomes could nearly always be identified, though exact similarity to the normal types was not found when deletions resulted in partial loss of chromosome arms. Telocentric chromosomes, not present in the normal diploid complement, were a feature of most strains and in some cases could be related to centromeric misdivision with persistence of 1 or 2 arms as functioning chromosomes. Other aberrant chromosome forms could not be identified with normal chromosome types. The changes in chromosome complements in these nonclonal cultures were fluctuating events unassociated with obvious changes in cultural or morphological appearances. A characteristic chromosome pattern with an unusual chromosome form appeared in a methylcholanthrene-treated subline of 1 cell strain, 5 months after exposure to the carcinogen. Subsequently, however, this characteristic pattern disappeared, and the chromosome complement of the treated subline did not differ significantly from the untreated parent cell strain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The serial cultivation of human diploid cell strains
Hayflick, L., & Moorhead, P. S. (1961) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/0014-4827(61)90192-6 · Cited by 8,508
Formation of a keratinizing epithelium in culture by a cloned cell line derived from a teratoma
Rheinwald, J. G., & Green, H. (1975) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(75)90183-x · Cited by 1,122
Elkind, M. M., & Sutton, H. (2012) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rrav02.1 · Cited by 706
Asynchronous Duplication of Chromosomes in Cultured Cells of Chinese Hamster
Taylor, J. H. (1960) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.7.3.455 · Cited by 516
Janzowski, C., Glaab, V, Samimi, E., Schlatter, J., & Eisenbrand, G. (2000) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/s0278-6915(00)00070-3 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1959-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 393-425
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2414939181
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Further Observations on the Chromosomes of Chinese Hamster Cells in Tissue Culture 2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/22.4.765
- The paper
- Further Observations on the Chromosomes of Chinese Hamster Cells in Tissue Culture 2. (1959). JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/22.4.765
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.