The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Factors Influencing Canine Mammary Cancer Development and Postsurgical Survival 2
Abstract
A retrospective study was conducted involving canine mammary cancer cases and age- and breed-matched controls. Only histologically confirmed malignant mammary cases were used. Of these, 71 were diagnosed as adenocarcinomas and 22 as malignant mixed mammary tumors. There were 87 case-controlled matches. Factors studied were classified within the categories of neutering, estrus, pseudopregnancy, parity, fecundity, and postsurgical survival. Within the scope of these variables, there were no differences in effects on the occurrence of adenocarcinomas or malignant mixed mammary tumors. Among the variables, neutered bitches had 12% of the mammary cancer risk as compared to intact animals. Bitches spayed before any estrous cycles had approximately 0.5% of the mammary cancer risk; those that had only 1 estrous cycle had 8%, and animals that had 2 or more estrous cycles before neutering, 26%. Within the group having 2 or more estrous cycles before being spayed, those neutered before 2½ years of age exhibited a marked sparing effect on mammary cancer risk not shown for bitches neutered after 2½ years of age. Tests of various factors within the categories of pseudopregnancy, parity, and fecundity indicated no significant effects on mammary cancer risk. Survival data, based on observation for a minimum of 42 months after surgical removal of the cancer, indicated excess mortality due to mammary cancer was concentrated in the first year; 2½ times more dogs died, either naturally or by euthanasia, than expected. Apparently the younger an animal at the time of cancer surgery, the more apt it was to survive. Neutering after cancer diagnosis did not affect either survival or cause of death. The age distribution of mammary cancer in female dogs was compared to the age distribution of breast cancer in women. Mammary cancer in the bitch mimics that of human breast cancer, except that the dog, after maturity, ages at 4 times the rate of humans. This age similarity and the common sparing effect of neutering in the 2 species provide strong support for the use of canine mammary cancer as a research model for breast cancer in women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Survey of veterinary practice policies and opinions on neutering dogs
Diesel, G., Brodbelt, D., & Laurence, C. (2010) · Veterinary Record · doi:10.1136/vr.b4798 · Cited by 59
Scarlett, J., & Johnston, N. (2012) · Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science · doi:10.1080/10888705.2012.624902 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1969-12
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1249-61
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2100530682
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors Influencing Canine Mammary Cancer Development and Postsurgical Survival 2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/43.6.1249
- The paper
- Factors Influencing Canine Mammary Cancer Development and Postsurgical Survival 2. (1969). JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/43.6.1249
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.