The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Breast Cancer in Women After Repeated Fluoroscopic Examinations of the Chest2
Abstract
A follow-up study of 1,764 female patients, discharged alive from two tuberculosis sanatoria in Massachusetts between 1930 and 1954, was conducted. In the course of air collapse therapy of the lung (pneumothorax and pneumoperitoneum), 1,047 women were fluoroscopically examined an average of 102 times over a period of several years. A comparison group of 717 women with tuberculosis received other treatments that did not require fluoroscopic monitoring. A 1975 mailing address or a death certificate was obtained for 93.6% of the study subjects, and 78% of 1,146 living patients responded to a mailed questionnaire. An excess of breast cancer (41 observed and 23.3 expected) was seen among the fluoroscopically examined women, whereas no excess (15 observed and 14.1 expected) was apparent among the comparison women. When age was considered, the greatest absolute excess breast cancer risk occurred among exposed women who were first treated between the ages of 15 and 19 years. Among those women 30 years of age and older at the time of first exposure, no elevated breast cancer risk was detected; the failure to observe an excess, however, may be a matter of sampling variation inasmuch as a 50% increased risk could not be excluded. The concentration of excess breast cancer cases among women initially exposed before the age of 30 years suggests that young women may be particularly sensitive to radiation injury. Breast cancer excess risk was also seen to increase with increasing radiation dose, and a linear dose-response relationship is consistent with the data. The excess breast cancer risk did not appear until 15 years after initial exposure and was present at the end of 40 years of observation. The radiation risk estimate for the women living 10 years or more after first exposure is 6.2 excess breast cancer cases per million woman-year-rad.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Incidence of Cancer in 161 Families Affected by Ataxia–Telangiectasia
Swift, M., Morrell, D., Massey, R. B., & Chase, C. L. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199112263252602 · Cited by 939
Miller, A. B., Howe, G. R., Sherman, G. J., Lindsay, J. P., Yaffe, M. J., Dinner, P. J., Risch, H. A., & Preston, D. L. (1989) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198911093211902 · Cited by 363
Genistein Chemoprevention: Timing and Mechanisms of Action in Murine Mammary and Prostate
Lamartiniere, C. A., Cotroneo, M. S., Fritz, W. A., Wang, J., Mentor-Marcel, R., & Elgavish, A. (2002) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/132.3.552s · Cited by 332
Krieger, N. (1989) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/bf02106571 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Boice, J. D., & Monson, R. R.
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1977-09
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 823-832
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2237993566
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breast Cancer in Women After Repeated Fluoroscopic Examinations of the Chest2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/59.3.823
- The paper
- Boice, J. D., & Monson, R. R. (1977). Breast Cancer in Women After Repeated Fluoroscopic Examinations of the Chest2. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/59.3.823
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.