The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of the Mutagenicity and DNA-Modifying Activity of Carcinogens and Noncarcinogens in Microbial Systems 2
Abstract
The mutagenicity of 99 chemicals was determined in a standard Salmonella typhimurium assay with the use of strains TA1535 and TA1538; the DNA-modifying capacity was determined with normal and DNA polymerase-deficient Escherichia coli strains. The following categories of chemicals were studied: alkylating agents (15); nitrosamines, hydrazines, and related substances (8); heterocyclics (10); aromatic amines (36); polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (11); amides, ureas, and acylating agents (7); antimetabolites (5); inorganics (4); and promoters (3). Of the substances studied, 21 were known noncarcinogens, 21 were ultimate carcinogens, and 45 were procarcinogens. Of the noncarcinogens, 35, 30, and 25% were positive in the Salmonella, E. coli, and both systems, respectively. All of the ultimate carcinogens were detectable as mutagens of DNA-modifying agents; 79, 100, and 79% gave positive tests in the Salmonella, E. coli, and both systems, respectively. Of the procarcinogens 72% were identifiable by these procedures: 52, 67, and 48% in the Salmonella, E. coli, and both assays, respectively. A tabulation of the combined data for ultimate carcinogens and procarcinogens indicates that 77% of the carcinogens gave positive results: 61, 74, and 59% in the Salmonella, E. coli, and both assays, respectively. We suggest that, for prescreening procedures with microbial assays, S. typhimurium strains TA98 and TA100 be included and the standard E. coli DNA polymerase-deficient assay be run in tandem with the Salmonella mutagenicity assay. When the standard E. coli DNA polymerase-deficient assay does not give interpretable results because of the lack of zones of growth inhibition, a modified assay with the use of liquid suspension should be performed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Short-term tests for carcinogens and mutagens
Hollstein, M., McCann, J., Angelosanto, F. A., & Nichols, W. W. (1979) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/0165-1110(79)90014-9 · Cited by 685
Mutagenicity of Nitroaromatic Compounds
Purohit, V., & Basu, A. K. (2000) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx000002x · Cited by 450
Combes, R. D., & Haveland-Smith, R. B. (1982) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/0165-1110(82)90015-x · Cited by 318
A critical review of the literature on acrolein toxicity
Beauchamp, R. O., Andjelkovich, D. A., Kligerman, A. D., Morgan, K. T., Heck, H. D., & Feron, V. J. (1985) · CRC Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.3109/10408448509037461 · Cited by 273
Bomhard, E. M., & Herbold, B. A. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.1080/10408440500442384 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1979-04
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 873-92
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2164684230
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of the Mutagenicity and DNA-Modifying Activity of Carcinogens and Noncarcinogens in Microbial Systems 2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/62.4.873
- The paper
- Evaluation of the Mutagenicity and DNA-Modifying Activity of Carcinogens and Noncarcinogens in Microbial Systems 2. (1979). JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/62.4.873
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.