The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of Cholic Acid Feeding on N-Methyl-N-nitrosourea-Induced Colon Tumors and Cell Kinetics in Rats 23
Abstract
The tumor-inducing effects of cholic acid feeding were examined in cesarean-derived F344 rats treated with intrarectally administered N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU). The rats were divided into 4 treatment groups. Group 1 received control chow; group 2, control chow and cholic acid (0.2%); group 3, control chow and 8 mg MNU; and group 4, control chow plus 0.2% cholic acid and 8 mg MNU. At 28 weeks, rats in groups 1 and 2 had no tumors. Group 3 had a tumor incidence of 54% (1.1 tumors/animal), whereas rats in group 4 had a tumor incidence of 62% (1.8 tumors/animal). Significantly more tumors were seen in group 4 than in group 3 (modified chi-square, P<0.05). Tumors were primarily adenomas, but invasive adenocarcinomas were also detected. The tumors increased in size from adenomas to invasive carcinomas. Analyses at week 28 revealed a slight increase in fecal neutral sterols in groups 3 and 4 compared with their respective controls (2.17 vs. 1.90 and 2.22 vs. 1.65 mg/g). Conversion of cholesterol to coprostanol was similar in all groups (averaging 65% in groups 1 and 3 and 64% in groups 2 and 4). Total fecal bile acid output was elevated in the cholic acid-fed rats compared with their controls (9.52 vs. 3.68 mg/g feces). The major fecal bile acid in groups 2 and 4 was deoxycholic acid, whereas the amounts of cholic acid were similar in all groups. Deoxycholic acid was presumed to be the primary tumor promoter (or cocarcinogen). Cell kinetics were measured at weeks 5 and 19. At 5 weeks groups 2 and 4 showed enhanced cell proliferation over control values. Cell proliferation was also increased as a result of the MNU-induced damage (group 3). The cumulative effect of MNU and cholic acid feeding increased the numbers of epithelial cells that underwent DNA synthesis. The heightened cell turnover allowed tumors to occur with greater frequency as seen in the cholic acid- plus MNU-treated rats.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tung, B. Y., Emond, M. J., Haggitt, R. C., Bronner, M. P., Kimmey, M. B., Kowdley, K. V., & Brentnall, T. A. (2001) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-134-2-200101160-00008 · Cited by 469
Anticancer steroids: linking natural and semi-synthetic compounds
Salvador, J. A. R., Carvalho, J. F. S., Neves, M. A. C., Silvestre, S. M., Leitão, A. J., Silva, M. M. C., & Sá e Melo, M. L. (2013) · Nat. Prod. Rep. · doi:10.1039/c2np20082a · Cited by 276
Cohen, S. M., & Ito, N. (2002) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.1080/20024091064282 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1980-03
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 573-8
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2169815406
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Cholic Acid Feeding on N-Methyl-N-nitrosourea-Induced Colon Tumors and Cell Kinetics in Rats 23. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/64.3.573
- The paper
- Effect of Cholic Acid Feeding on N-Methyl-N-nitrosourea-Induced Colon Tumors and Cell Kinetics in Rats 23. (1980). JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/64.3.573
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.