The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prognostic Factors for Survival in Patients With Inoperable Lung Cancer 2
Abstract
Seventy-seven prognostic factors were considered in an evaluation of more than 5,000 patients with inoperable bronchogenic carcinoma of the lung; these patients were entered on the Veterans Administration Lung Group protocols 9-15 (1968-78). Fifty prognostic factors for survival were identified, and their relative contributions to patient survival were considered. The three most important prognostic factors affecting survival were the Karnofsky initial performance status score, extent of disease, and weight loss in the previous 6 months. These factors denoted three general prognostic components: current physical status, current disease status, and prior physical status. Initial performance status was the dominant prognostic factor. Characterization of patient's function status with the use of the Karnofsky scale was preferred to a summarized scale or a dichotomization into ambulatory versus nonambulatory. The current practice of dichotomizing factors resulted in the loss of much prognostic information. Other factors, such as tumor size, histologic type, and institution, appeared to be important when considered alone. However, their contribution was relatively minor after a correction was made for the effects of initial performance status, extent of disease, and prior weight loss. Depending on these three prognostic factors alone, median survival varied between 6 weeks and over a year. Reporting of results without the consideration of such prognostic factors severly hampers any comparisons that may be made between investigations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines.
Schag, C. C., Heinrich, R. L., & Ganz, P. A. (1984) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1984.2.3.187 · Cited by 1,517
Schnipper, L. E., Smith, T. J., Raghavan, D., Blayney, D. W., Ganz, P. A., Mulvey, T. M., & Wollins, D. S. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.42.8375 · Cited by 649
Paesmans, M., Sculier, J. P., Libert, P., Bureau, G., Dabouis, G., Thiriaux, J., Michel, J., Van Cutsem, O., Sergysels, R., & Mommen, P. (1995) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1995.13.5.1221 · Cited by 386
Immune checkpoint inhibitors in challenging populations
Johnson, D. B., Sullivan, R. J., & Menzies, A. M. (2017) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.30642 · Cited by 339
Screening the nutritional status in oncology: a preliminary report on 1,000 outpatients
Bozzetti, F., & on behalf of the SCRINIO Working Group (2009) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-008-0476-3 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1980-07
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-32
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2109539147
- Cited by
- 564
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Factors for Survival in Patients With Inoperable Lung Cancer 2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/65.1.25
- The paper
- Prognostic Factors for Survival in Patients With Inoperable Lung Cancer 2. (1980). JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/65.1.25
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.