The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessment of Lung Cancer Risk Factors by Histologic Category
Abstract
The patterns of risk by histologic type of lung cancer were analyzed with the use of data from a large hospital-based case-control study (7,804 cases and 15,207 controls) of lung cancer performed in Western Europe. Relative risks (RR) increased with duration of cigarette use for all histologic types, although the gradients of risk were greater for Kreyberg I cell types, particularly squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), than for adenocarcinoma (AC). Risks also declined more sharply with years since cessation of smoking for all Kreyberg I cell types, in particular for SCC, rather than for AC. After adjustment for duration of use, the RR associated with number of cigarettes smoked per day, frequency and depth of inhalation, and fraction of cigarette consumed were not consistently different by cell type, suggesting that intensity-related measures of cigarette exposure have less effect on cell type than duration-related factors. Among those who never smoked there were marked cell type differences by sex, with a greater proportion of AC compared to SCC for females (45 vs. 25%) than for males (35 vs. 33%). Review of limited work histories indicated that occupational associations also were more strongly related to Kreyberg I than to Kreyberg II tumors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture
Parkin, D. M., Bray, F. I., & Devesa, S. S. (2001) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00267-2 · Cited by 2,169
Differences in Lung Cancer Risk Between Men and Women: Examination of the Evidence
Zang, E. A., & Wynder, E. L. (1996) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/88.3-4.183 · Cited by 722
Effect of cigarette smoking on major histological types of lung cancer: a meta-analysis
Khuder, S. A. (2001) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0169-5002(00)00181-1 · Cited by 522
Prospective Study of Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Risk of Lung Cancer Among Men and Women
Feskanich, D. (2000) · Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/92.22.1812 · Cited by 454
Lee, P. N., Forey, B. A., & Coombs, K. J. (2012) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/1471-2407-12-385 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Lubin, J. H., & Blot, W. J.
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1984-08-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 383-389
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W1942505355
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Lung Cancer Risk Factors by Histologic Category. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/73.2.383
- The paper
- Lubin, J. H., & Blot, W. J. (1984). Assessment of Lung Cancer Risk Factors by Histologic Category. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/73.2.383
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.