Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 862

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Histopathologic Prognostic Factors in Neuroblastic Tumors: Definition of Subtypes of Ganglioneuroblastoma and an Age-Linked Classification of Neuroblastomas

Shimada, Hiroyuki, Chatten, Jane, Newton, William A., Sachs, Nancy, Hamoudi, Ala B., Chiba, Tsuneo, Marsden, Henry B., Misugi, Kazuaki·1984·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

Histopathologic prognostic factors of 295 pretreatment tumors of a total 641 neuroblastomas and ganglioneuroblastomas were studied with the use of the following proposed tumor classification. The tumors were divided into 2 groups: stroma-poor (235 cases) and stroma-rich (60 cases) according to their organizational pattern (stromal development). The stroma-poor group was classified further into 2 subgroups: favorable stroma-poor (84% survival) and unfavorable stroma-poor (4.5% survival) according to the patient's age at diagnosis, degree of maturation, and nuclear pathology [mitosis-karyorrhexis index (MKI)] of the neuroblastic cells. The stroma-rich group was further classified into 3 subgroups: well differentiated (100% survival), intermixed (92% survival), and nodular (18% survival) on the basis of morphology of the immature element in the tumor tissue without regard to patient's age or quantitative maturation. Favorable stroma-poor and well-differentiated and intermixed stroma-rich groups seem to make good prognosis groups (87% survival), which show gradual progression along a maturational sequence according to the age of the patient. Unfavorable stroma-poor and nodular stroma-rich groups form poor prognosis groups (7% survival) and show morphological evidence of malignant or aggressive behavior, such as inappropriate immaturity for age, higher MKI, and gross nodule formation by immature neuroblasts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/73.2.405

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 862

Metadata

Authors
Shimada, H., Chatten, J., Newton, W. A., Sachs, N., Hamoudi, A. B., Chiba, T., Marsden, H. B., & Misugi, K.
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
1984-08-01
Volume
73
Issue
2
Pages
405-416
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W1926885922
Cited by
862
References
0
FWCI
9.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Histopathologic Prognostic Factors in Neuroblastic Tumors: Definition of Subtypes of Ganglioneuroblastoma and an Age-Linked Classification of Neuroblastomas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/73.2.405
The paper
Shimada, H., Chatten, J., Newton, W. A., Sachs, N., Hamoudi, A. B., Chiba, T., Marsden, H. B., & Misugi, K. (1984). Histopathologic Prognostic Factors in Neuroblastic Tumors: Definition of Subtypes of Ganglioneuroblastoma and an Age-Linked Classification of Neuroblastomas. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/73.2.405

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.