Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 400

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy or BCG for Colon Cancer: Results From NSABP Protocol C-011

Wolmark, N., Fisher, B., Rockette, H., Redmond, C., Wickerham, D. L., Fisher, E. R., Jones, J., Glass, A., Lerner, H., Lawrence, W., Prager, D., Wexler, M., Evans, J., Cruz, A., Dimitrov, N., Jochimsen, P., Other NSABP Investigators·1988·JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

Data are presented from 1,166 patients with Dukes B and C carcinoma of the colon who were entered into the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol C-01 between November 1977 and February 1983. Patients were randomized to one of three therapeutic categories: 1) no further treatment following curative resection (394 patients); 2) postoperative chemotherapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil, semustine, and vincristine (379 patients); or 3) postoperative BCG (393 patients). The average time on study was 77.3 months. A comparison between patients receiving postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and those treated with surgery alone indicated that there was an overall improvement in disease-free survival (P = .02) and survival (P = .05) in favor of the chemotherapy-treated group. At 5 years of follow-up, patients treated with surgery alone were at 1.29 times the risk of developing a treatment failure and at 1.31 times the likelihood of dying as were similar patients treated with combination adjuvant chemotherapy. Comparison of the BCG-treated group with the group treated with surgery alone indicated that there was no statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (P = .09). There was, however, a survival advantage in favor of the BCG-treated group (P = .03). At 5 years of follow-up, patients randomized to the surgery-alone arm were at 1.28 times the risk of dying as were similar patients treated with BCG. Further investigation disclosed that this survival advantage in favor of BCG was a result of a diminution in deaths that were non-cancer related. When analyses were conducted on which events not related to cancer recurrence were eliminated, the survival difference between the BCG and control groups became nonsignificant (P = .40); the cumulative odds at 5 years decreased from 1.28 to 1.10. The findings from this study are the first from a randomized prospective clinical trial to demonstrate that a significant disease-free survival and survival benefit can be achieved with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Dukes B and C carcinoma of the colon who have undergone curative resection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/80.1.30

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 400

Metadata

Authors
Wolmark, N., Fisher, B., Rockette, H., Redmond, C., Wickerham, D. L., Fisher, E. R., Jones, J., Glass, A., Lerner, H., Lawrence, W., Prager, D., Wexler, M., Evans, J., Cruz, A., Dimitrov, N., Jochimsen, P., & Other NSABP Investigators
Venue
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
1988-03-02
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
30-36
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2016791396
Cited by
400
References
0
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy or BCG for Colon Cancer: Results From NSABP Protocol C-011. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/80.1.30
The paper
Wolmark, N., Fisher, B., Rockette, H., Redmond, C., Wickerham, D. L., Fisher, E. R., Jones, J., Glass, A., Lerner, H., Lawrence, W., Prager, D., Wexler, M., Evans, J., Cruz, A., Dimitrov, N., Jochimsen, P., & Other NSABP Investigators. (1988). Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy or BCG for Colon Cancer: Results From NSABP Protocol C-011. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/80.1.30

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.