Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Phase I Trial of 5-Day Continuous Venous Infusion of Oxaliplatin at Circadian Rhythm-Modulated Rate Compared With Constant Rate

Caussanel, Jean-Pierre, Lévi, Francis, Brienza, Silvano, Misset, Jean-Louis, Itzhaki, Moshe, Adam, René, Milano, Gérard, Hecquet, Bernard, Mathé, Georges·1990·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

The toxic effects and tissue uptake of both cisplatin and oxaliplatin--[(1R, 2R)-1,2-cyclohexanediamine-N,N'] [oxalato(2-)-O,O']platinum--were previously shown to vary similarly according to dosing time in mice. A 4-hour infusion of cisplatin resulted in fewer side effects and allowed administration of higher doses at 16 hours than at 4 hours in patients with cancer. We hypothesized that the continuous venous infusion of oxaliplatin for 5 days would be less toxic and would deliver a higher dose to the patient if the drug were infused at a circadian rhythm-modulated rate (peak at 16 hr; schedule B) rather than at a constant rate (schedule A). We tested this hypothesis in a randomized phase I trial. We escalated the dose of oxaliplatin to the patient by 25 mg/m2 per course. Courses were repeated every 3 weeks. An external, multichannel, programmable-in-time pump was used for the infusions. Toxicity was assessable for 94 courses in 23 patients (12 patients with breast carcinoma, nine with hepatocellular carcinoma, and two with cholangiocarcinoma). The incidence of neutropenia of World Health Organization grades II-IV and the incidence of distal paresthesias were 10 or more times higher (P less than .05) with schedule A than with schedule B. In addition, vomiting was 55% higher (P = .15) with schedule A than with schedule B. Furthermore, with schedule B, the mean dose of oxaliplatin (P less than .001) and its maximum tolerated dose (P = .06) could be increased by 15% over those doses with schedule A. An objective response was achieved in two of the 12 patients with previously treated breast cancer. We recommend that the dose of oxaliplatin for phase II trials be 175 mg/m2, delivered according to the circadian rhythm-modulated rate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/82.12.1046

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Caussanel, J.-P., Lévi, F., Brienza, S., Misset, J.-L., Itzhaki, M., Adam, R., Milano, G., Hecquet, B., & Mathé, G.
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
1990-06-20
Volume
82
Issue
12
Pages
1046-1050
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2065982243
Cited by
253
References
0
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase I Trial of 5-Day Continuous Venous Infusion of Oxaliplatin at Circadian Rhythm-Modulated Rate Compared With Constant Rate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/82.12.1046
The paper
Caussanel, J.-P., Lévi, F., Brienza, S., Misset, J.-L., Itzhaki, M., Adam, R., Milano, G., Hecquet, B., & Mathé, G. (1990). Phase I Trial of 5-Day Continuous Venous Infusion of Oxaliplatin at Circadian Rhythm-Modulated Rate Compared With Constant Rate. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/82.12.1046

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.