The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Screening Sigmoidoscopy and Colorectal Cancer Mortality
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sigmoidoscopy may reduce colorectal cancer mortality by identifying both cancers and precursor lesions (including polyps) for treatment; however, evidence regarding the efficacy of this technique as a screening procedure is extremely limited. PURPOSE: In the absence of data from randomized controlled trials, we performed a retrospective case-control study to determine if sigmoidoscopy screening is associated with a reduction in colorectal cancer mortality. METHODS: The medical records of 66 members of the Greater Marshfield Community Health Plan (GMCHP) who died of large-bowel cancer from 1979 to 1988 were reviewed for history of screening for colorectal cancer (case subjects). For comparison, the records of 196 GMCHP members of similar gender, age, and enrollment duration were randomly selected for review (control subjects). RESULTS: History of screening sigmoidoscopy was much less common among case subjects (10%) than among control subjects (30%). Risk for death from colorectal cancer was reduced among individuals having had a single examination by screening sigmoidoscopy (odds ratio = 0.21; 95% confidence interval = 0.08-0.52), compared with the risk for those who never had one. The reduction in risk appeared to be limited to tumors in the rectum and distal colon. Neither fecal occult blood testing nor digital rectal examination was associated with a reduction in colorectal cancer mortality. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that screening sigmoidoscopy can substantially reduce mortality from cancers of the rectum and distal colon.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kamangar, F., Dores, G. M., & Anderson, W. F. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.05.2308 · Cited by 3,434
WINAWER, S. (2003) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/gast.2003.50044 · Cited by 2,143
Association of Colonoscopy and Death From Colorectal Cancer
Baxter, N. N., Goldwasser, M. A., Paszat, L. F., Saskin, R., Urbach, D. R., & Rabeneck, L. (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-150-1-200901060-00306 · Cited by 1,254
Meta-analyses of colorectal cancer risk factors
Johnson, C. M., Wei, C., Ensor, J. E., Smolenski, D. J., Amos, C. I., Levin, B., & Berry, D. A. (2013) · Cancer Causes & Control · doi:10.1007/s10552-013-0201-5 · Cited by 779
Pignone, M., Rich, M., Teutsch, S. M., Berg, A. O., & Lohr, K. N. (2002) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-2-200207160-00015 · Cited by 741
Metadata
- Authors
- Newcomb, P. A., Norfleet, R. G., Storer, B. E., Surawicz, T. S., & Marcus, P. M.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-10-21
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 1572-1575
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2077348225
- Cited by
- 911
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Screening Sigmoidoscopy and Colorectal Cancer Mortality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/84.20.1572
- The paper
- Newcomb, P. A., Norfleet, R. G., Storer, B. E., Surawicz, T. S., & Marcus, P. M. (1992). Screening Sigmoidoscopy and Colorectal Cancer Mortality. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/84.20.1572
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.