The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cancer Treatment and Age: Patient Perspectives
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite some evidence that age does not meaningfully influence the efficacy or toxicity of cancer treatment, older patients tend to receive less comprehensive cancer therapies. PURPOSE: We conducted a population-based study to evaluate the selection of cancer treatment among the elderly. METHODS: Between September 1 and November 30, 1990, we interviewed by telephone a sample of 628 female Wisconsin residents recently diagnosed with breast (507) or colorectal (121) cancer. The women, aged 20-74 at the time of diagnosis, were identified through Wisconsin's statewide tumor registry. The approximately 30-minute long telephone interview, part of a larger study of cancer etiology, included questions on treatment history, physician specialty, and reasons for the selection of specific therapies. Analyses compared the proportion of subjects with various treatment characteristics according to age (< 65 and > or = 65 years). In evaluating the effect of age on selected therapies, we adjusted summary proportions for stage of disease using the indirect method. The Mantel-Haenszel chi square statistic was used to evaluate statistical significance of the differences in proportions. RESULTS: After adjusting for stage of disease at diagnosis, substantial variation was observed in cancer treatment according to age for both breast and colorectal cancer. Older women (> or = 65 years) with breast cancer were less likely than younger women (< 65 years) to have received conservative surgery, radiation, and adjuvant therapy. Older women were, in fact, more likely than younger women to accept mastectomy (P = .03). Consultation with a medical or radiation oncologist was less common among older than younger patients (57% versus 73%). Older women were also less likely to have alternative therapies presented to them (19% versus 31%). While older patients were less likely to have been offered adjuvant treatments, like chemotherapy (P < .01), they were also more likely than younger women to reject these treatments when offered (P = .01). These differences were observed in both breast and colorectal cancer patients. Regardless of age, the most common reasons for not selecting treatments were physicians' recommendations and the desire for more comprehensive treatment. Concern about side effects, however, was more frequently reported by older women (P = .07). CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION: Patients' ages influence the choice of treatment. Physicians offer older women with cancer different treatments from those offered to younger women and are less likely to recommend specialist consultation. Physicians' advice and description of toxicity may influence patients' selection of treatment. However, older patients' concerns about the consequences of cancer treatment may also influence treatment choice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review
Simmonds, P., Best, L., George, S., Baughan, C., Buchanan, R., Davis, C., Fentiman, I., Gosney, M., Northover, J., & Williams, C. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02713-6 · Cited by 600
Age and Adjuvant Chemotherapy Use After Surgery for Stage III Colon Cancer
Schrag, D., Cramer, L. D., Bach, P. B., & Begg, C. B. (2001) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/93.11.850 · Cited by 481
Ayanian, J. Z., Zaslavsky, A. M., Fuchs, C. S., Guadagnoli, E., Creech, C. M., Cress, R. D., O’Connor, L. C., West, D. W., Allen, M. E., Wolf, R. E., et al. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2003.06.178 · Cited by 308
Mandelblatt, J. S., Hadley, J., Kerner, J. F., Schulman, K. A., Gold, K., Dunmore-Griffith, J., Edge, S., Guadagnoli, E., Lynch, J. J., Meropol, N. J., et al. (2000) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20000801)89:3<561::aid-cncr11>3.0.co;2-a · Cited by 277
Dees, E. C., O'reilly, S., Goodman, S. N., Sartorius, S., Levine, M. A., Jones, R. J., Grochow, L. B., Donehower, R. C., & Fetting, J. H. (2000) · Cancer Investigation · doi:10.3109/07357900009012191 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Newcomb, P. A., & Carbone, P. P.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-10-06
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 1580-1584
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2154433065
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer Treatment and Age: Patient Perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/85.19.1580
- The paper
- Newcomb, P. A., & Carbone, P. P. (1993). Cancer Treatment and Age: Patient Perspectives. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/85.19.1580
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.