Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 430

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Recent Trends in U.S. Breast Cancer Incidence, Survival, and Mortality Rates

Open access
Chu, K. C., Tarone, R. E., Kessler, L. G., Ries, L. A. G., Hankey, B. F., Miller, B. A., Edwards, B. K.·1996·JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have demonstrated that use of mammographic screening and advances in therapy can improve prognosis for women with breast cancer. PURPOSE: We determined the trends in breast cancer mortality rates, as well as incidence and survival rates by extent of disease at diagnosis, for white women in the United States and considered whether these trends are consistent with widespread use of such beneficial medical interventions. METHODS: We examined mortality data from the National Center for Health Statistics and incidence and survival data by extent of disease from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute, all stratified by patient age, using statistical-regression techniques to determine changes in the slope of trends over time. RESULTS: The age-adjusted breast cancer mortality rate for U.S. white females dropped 6.8% from 1989 through 1993. A significant decrease in the slope of the mortality trend of approximately 2% per year was observed in every decade of age from 40 to 79 years of age. Trends in incidence rates were also similar among these age groups: localized disease rates increased rapidly from 1982 through 1987 and stabilized or increased more slowly thereafter; regional disease rates decreased after 1987; and distant disease rates have remained level over the past 20 years. Three-year relative survival rates increased steadily and significantly for both localized and regional disease from 1980 through 1989 in all ages, with no evidence of an increase in slope in the late 1980s. IMPLICATIONS: The decrease in the diagnosis of regional disease in the late 1980s in women over the age of 40 years likely reflects the increased use of mammography earlier in the 1980s. The increase in survival rates, particularly for regional disease, likely reflects improvements in systemic adjuvant therapy. Statistical modeling indicates that the recent drop in breast cancer mortality is too rapid to be explained only by the increased use of mammography; likewise, there has been no equivalent dramatic increase in survival rates that would implicate therapy alone. Thus, indications are that both are involved in the recent rapid decline in breast cancer mortality rates in the United States.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/88.21.1571

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 430

Metadata

Authors
Chu, K. C., Tarone, R. E., Kessler, L. G., Ries, L. A. G., Hankey, B. F., Miller, B. A., & Edwards, B. K.
Venue
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
1996-11-06
Volume
88
Issue
21
Pages
1571-1579
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2131723862
Cited by
430
References
0
FWCI
10.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent Trends in U.S. Breast Cancer Incidence, Survival, and Mortality Rates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/88.21.1571
The paper
Chu, K. C., Tarone, R. E., Kessler, L. G., Ries, L. A. G., Hankey, B. F., Miller, B. A., & Edwards, B. K. (1996). Recent Trends in U.S. Breast Cancer Incidence, Survival, and Mortality Rates. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/88.21.1571

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.