The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CYP2E1 Genetic Polymorphisms and Risk of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Taiwan
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma occurs disproportionately among individuals of Chinese descent. The cytochrome P450 2E1 enzyme (CYP2E1) is known to activate nitrosamines and other carcinogens that are possibly involved in the development of this disease. Certain alleles of the CYP2E1 gene are thought to be more highly expressed than others, and their distribution varies between Asian and Caucasian populations. We conducted a case-control study to investigate whether such variations affect the risk of developing nasopharyngeal cancer. METHODS: Three hundred sixty-four patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (96% of 378 eligible patients) and 320 control subjects (86% of 374 eligible subjects) were studied. A risk factor questionnaire was administered to participants to assess factors postulated to be linked to nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Peripheral blood was obtained from all subjects and DNA was purified from nucleated cells. A polymerase chain reaction-based restriction fragment length polymorphism assay that used the restriction enzymes Rsa I and Dra I was used to detect wild-type and variant forms of the CYP2E1 gene. RESULTS: Individuals homozygous for an allele of the CYP2E1 gene that is detected by Rsa I digestion (c2 allele) were found to have an increased risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (relative risk [RR] = 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2-5.7); this effect was limited to nonsmokers (RR = 9.3; 95% CI = 2.7-32) and was not affected by alcohol consumption. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the CYP2E1 genotype is a determinant of nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cancer Incidence in Five Continents
(1966) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85849-9 · Cited by 5,936
Cited by
The Enigmatic Epidemiology of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Chang, E. T., & Adami, H.-O. (2006) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-06-0353 · Cited by 1,297
Epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Yu, M. C., & Yuan, J.-M. (2002) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/s1044579x02000858 · Cited by 936
Focus on nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Lo, K. W., To, K. F., & Huang, D. P. (2004) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/s1535-6108(04)00119-9 · Cited by 559
Genetic and epigenetic changes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Lo, K.-W., & Huang, D. P. (2002) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/s1044579x02000883 · Cited by 269
Hasler, J. A., Estabrook, R., Murray, M., Pikuleva, I., Waterman, M., Capdevila, J., Holla, V., Helvig, C., Falck, J. R., Farrell, G., et al. (1999) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0098-2997(99)00005-9 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Hildesheim, A., Anderson, L. M., Chen, C.-J., Cheng, Y.-J., Brinton, L. A., Daly, A. K., Reed, C. D., Chen, I.-H., Caporaso, N. E., Hsu, M.-M., Chen, J.-Y., Idle, J. R., Hoover, R. N., Yang, C.-S., & Chhabra, S. K.
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-08-20
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1207-1212
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W1992877948
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CYP2E1 Genetic Polymorphisms and Risk of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Taiwan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/89.16.1207
- The paper
- Hildesheim, A., Anderson, L. M., Chen, C.-J., Cheng, Y.-J., Brinton, L. A., Daly, A. K., Reed, C. D., Chen, I.-H., Caporaso, N. E., Hsu, M.-M., Chen, J.-Y., Idle, J. R., Hoover, R. N., Yang, C.-S., & Chhabra, S. K. (1997). CYP2E1 Genetic Polymorphisms and Risk of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Taiwan. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/89.16.1207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.