The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Review
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to evaluate the published literature on adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and sigmoidoscopy. Specifically, the review addresses the following: 1) prevalence of FOBT and sigmoidoscopy; 2) interventions to increase adherence to FOBT and sigmoidoscopy; 3) correlates or predictors of adherence to FOBT and sigmoidoscopy; and 4) reasons for nonadherence. Other objectives are to put the literature on CRC screening adherence in the context of recently reported findings from experimental interventions to change prevention and early detection behaviors and to suggest directions for future research on CRC screening adherence. CRC screening offers the potential both for primary and for secondary prevention. Data from the 1992 National Health Interview Survey show that 26% of the population more than 49 years of age report FOBT within the past 3 years and 33% report ever having had sigmoidoscopy. The Year 2000 goals set forth in Healthy People 2000 are for 50% of the population more than 49 years of age to report FOBT within the past 2 years and for 40% to report that they ever had sigmoidoscopy. Thus, systematic efforts to increase CRC screening are warranted. To date, attempts to promote CRC screening have used both a public health model that targets entire communities, e.g., mass media campaigns, and a medical model that targets individuals, e.g., general practice patients. Most of these efforts, however, did not include systematic evaluation of strategies to increase adherence. The data on FOBT show that the median adherence rate to programmatic offers of FOBT is between 40% and 50%, depending on the type of population offered the test, e.g., patients or employees. Approximately, 50% of those initially offered testing in unselected populations will respond to minimal prompts or interventions. A salient issue for FOBT, however, is whether or not the behavior can be sustained over time. Fewer studies examined adherence to sigmoidoscopy. Adherence was highest in relatives of CRC cases and in employer-sponsored programs offered to workers at increased risk of CRC. At present, we know very little about the determinants of CRC screening behaviors, particularly as they relate to rescreening.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Curry, S. J., Taplin, S. H., Anderman, C., Barlow, W. E., & Mcbride, C. (1993) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1006/pmed.1993.1029 · Cited by 58
Cited by
Hewitson, P., Glasziou, P., Watson, E., Towler, B., & Irwig, L. (2008) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01875.x · Cited by 990
Pignone, M., Rich, M., Teutsch, S. M., Berg, A. O., & Lohr, K. N. (2002) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-2-200207160-00015 · Cited by 741
Interventions That Increase Use of Adult Immunization and Cancer Screening Services: A Meta-Analysis
Stone, E. G., Morton, S. C., Hulscher, M. E., Maglione, M. A., Roth, E. A., Grimshaw, J. M., Mittman, B. S., Rubenstein, L. V., Rubenstein, L. Z., & Shekelle, P. G. (2002) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-136-9-200205070-00006 · Cited by 613
Current and future colorectal cancer screening strategies
Shaukat, A., & Levin, T. R. (2022) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-022-00612-y · Cited by 516
Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy
Ness, R. (2001) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9270(01)02437-6 · Cited by 473
Metadata
- Authors
- Vernon, S. W.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-10-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 1406-1422
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2142217125
- Cited by
- 755
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/89.19.1406
- The paper
- Vernon, S. W. (1997). Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Review. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/89.19.1406
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.