The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Complement Activation by Cremophor EL as a Possible Contributor to Hypersensitivity to Paclitaxel: an In Vitro Study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cancer patients treated with the anticancer drug, paclitaxel (Taxol) often experience mild to severe hypersensitivity reactions. It is not known how these reactions are induced and whether the inducer is paclitaxel or its vehicle (i.e., Cremophor EL in 50% ethanol). Molecules present in Cremophor EL are similar in structure to certain nonionic block copolymers that activate complement proteins (i.e., proteins involved in various immune processes). To explore the role of complement in the observed hypersensitivity reactions, we studied the effects of paclitaxel and Cremophor EL plus ethanol on human complement in vitro. METHODS: Serum specimens from healthy individuals and cancer patients were incubated with paclitaxel or with relevant control compounds (Cremophor EL with ethanol, ethanol only, docetaxel, and cyclosporine), and markers of complement activation (SC5b-9 and Bb) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Similar incubations were performed in the presence of inhibitors of complement activation (i.e., EGTA/Mg2+ and soluble complement receptor type 1 [sCR1]). RESULTS: Paclitaxel in Cremophor EL plus ethanol caused increased formation of SC5b-9 in serum specimens from 10 of 10 healthy control subjects and from five of 10 cancer patients. Experiments with one or more individual sera indicated the above effect was due to Cremophor EL plus ethanol, that increased formation of Bb also occurred, that the drug-induced rise in SC5b-9 was inhibited by sCR1, and that EGTA/Mg2+ partially inhibited SC5b-9 formation and stimulated Bb formation. IMPLICATION: The role of complement activation in hypersensitivity reactions associated with administration of paclitaxel in Cremophor EL plus ethanol should be studied in vivo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Poly(ethylene glycol) in Drug Delivery: Pros and Cons as Well as Potential Alternatives
Knop, K., Hoogenboom, R., Fischer, D., & Schubert, U. S. (2010) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200902672 · Cited by 3,533
Parameters influencing the stealthiness of colloidal drug delivery systems
Vonarbourg, A., Passirani, C., Saulnier, P., & Benoit, J.-P. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.039 · Cited by 740
Chanan-Khan, A., Szebeni, J., Savay, S., Liebes, L., Rafique, N. M., Alving, C. R., & Muggia, F. M. (2003) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdg374 · Cited by 479
Self-citationAnaphylaxis—a practice parameter update 2015
Lieberman, P., Nicklas, R. A., Randolph, C., Oppenheimer, J., Bernstein, D., Bernstein, J., Ellis, A., Golden, D. B. K., Greenberger, P., Kemp, S., et al. (2015) · Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.anai.2015.07.019 · Cited by 474
Szebeni, J. (2014) · Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2014.06.038 · Cited by 457
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Szebeni, J., Alving, C. R., & Muggia, F. M.
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-02-18
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 300-306
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2126077921
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complement Activation by Cremophor EL as a Possible Contributor to Hypersensitivity to Paclitaxel: an In Vitro Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/90.4.300
- The paper
- Szebeni, J., Alving, C. R., & Muggia, F. M. (1998). Complement Activation by Cremophor EL as a Possible Contributor to Hypersensitivity to Paclitaxel: an In Vitro Study. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/90.4.300
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.