The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dormancy of Mammary Carcinoma After Mastectomy
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The longest interval between primary treatment of breast cancer and tumor recurrence, i.e., the limit of breast cancer dormancy, defines the appropriate length of follow-up, the effectiveness of treatment, and curability (no excess mortality risk for patients relative to the general population) for the disease. To determine this limit, we analyzed long-term follow-up data from patients who underwent a radical mastectomy during a four-decade period at the University of Chicago Hospitals. METHODS: For 1547 patients operated on during the period from 1945 through mid-1987, the number of recurrences and deaths occurring within each postoperative year were tabulated, and the hazard rate for first recurrence or death from breast cancer was estimated by use of the actuarial method. The excess mortality rate was calculated for successive 5-year intervals, beginning at the time of mastectomy, by use of U.S. life tables and matching on the basis of age, race, and sex. RESULTS: Most recurrences occurred within the first 10 years after mastectomy. Recurrences were rare after 20 years; only one recurrence was reported among 192 patients followed for 26-45 years. Patients who had a recurrence within 5 years following mastectomy had shorter subsequent survival times than those whose recurrence appeared after 5 years (two-sided P = .0001). The excess death rate increased with pathologic stage of the primary tumor. Overall, there was evidence of excess mortality up to 20 years postsurgery (two-sided P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: The limit of breast cancer dormancy in this patient population appears to be between 20 and 25 years. After this time, recurrences were rare, and the mortality rate was no longer statistically significantly different from that of the general population. Patients surviving to this time without evidence of recurrence or contralateral breast cancer are probably cured.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to the brain
Bos, P. D., Zhang, X. H.-F., Nadal, C., Shu, W., Gomis, R. R., Nguyen, D. X., Minn, A. J., van de Vijver, M. J., Gerald, W. L., Foekens, J. A., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08021 · Cited by 1,863
The lingering mysteries of metastatic recurrence in breast cancer
Riggio, A. I., Varley, K. E., & Welm, A. L. (2021) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-020-01161-4 · Cited by 616
Mechanisms Governing Metastatic Dormancy and Reactivation
Giancotti, F. G. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.029 · Cited by 586
Autophagy, cancer stem cells and drug resistance
Smith, A. G., & Macleod, K. F. (2019) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.5222 · Cited by 365
Preclinical mouse solid tumour models: status quo, challenges and perspectives
Gengenbacher, N., Singhal, M., & Augustin, H. G. (2017) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2017.92 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Karrison, T. G., Ferguson, D. J., & Meier, P.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-01-06
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 80-85
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2143879648
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dormancy of Mammary Carcinoma After Mastectomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/91.1.80
- The paper
- Karrison, T. G., Ferguson, D. J., & Meier, P. (1999). Dormancy of Mammary Carcinoma After Mastectomy. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/91.1.80
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.