The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cancer Prevalence and Survivorship Issues: Analyses of the 1992 National Health Interview Survey
Abstract
BACKGROUND/METHODS: Relatively little is known about the size and makeup of the growing population of cancer survivors or about the social implications of a diagnosis of cancer. To explore these issues, we analyzed cancer survivorship information from the 1992 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), and resulting cancer prevalence estimates were compared with those derived from cancer registry data. RESULTS: According to the NHIS, there were an estimated 7.2 million adult survivors of cancer-excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer-in 1992, representing 3.9% of the U.S. adult population. Comparisons with prevalence estimates from cancer registry data suggest that cancer is underreported in the NHIS. Nearly three fifths (58.0%) of cancer survivors self-identified on the NHIS reported that their cancer was first detected when they noticed something wrong and went to a doctor. The majority (55.7%) of cancer survivors had obtained a second opinion or multiple opinions regarding their treatment. Most (58.0%) had received patient educational materials from a health care provider. However, relatively few had received counseling or participated in support groups (14.2%), contacted cancer organizations after their diagnosis (10.9%), or participated in a research study or clinical trial as part of their cancer treatment (4.7%). One ninth (10.7%) of the survivors had been denied health or life insurance coverage because of their cancer. Nearly one fifth (18.2%) of the cancer survivors who worked before or after their cancer was diagnosed experienced employment problems because of their cancer. CONCLUSIONS: While cancer appears to be underreported on the 1992 NHIS, the survey provides valuable information about the medical, insurance, and employment experience of cancer survivors selected from a nationally representative sample of U.S. households.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global Cancer Statistics, 2002
Parkin, D. M., Bray, F., Ferlay, J., & Pisani, P. (2005) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74 · Cited by 18,196
Hesse, B. W., Nelson, D. E., Kreps, G. L., Croyle, R. T., Arora, N. K., Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (2005) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.165.22.2618 · Cited by 1,523
Arm edema in breast cancer patients
Erickson, V. S., Pearson, M. L., Ganz, P. A., Adams, J., & Kahn, K. L. (2001) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/93.2.96 · Cited by 560
Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial care of adults with cancer
Turner, J., Zapart, S., Pedersen, K., Rankin, N., Luxford, K., & Fletcher, J. (2005) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.897 · Cited by 451
Health status of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors
Tai, E., Buchanan, N., Townsend, J., Fairley, T., Moore, A., & Richardson, L. C. (2012) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.27445 · Cited by 327
Metadata
- Authors
- Hewitt, M., Breen, N., & Devesa, S.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-09-01
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1480-1486
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2117106359
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer Prevalence and Survivorship Issues: Analyses of the 1992 National Health Interview Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/91.17.1480
- The paper
- Hewitt, M., Breen, N., & Devesa, S. (1999). Cancer Prevalence and Survivorship Issues: Analyses of the 1992 National Health Interview Survey. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/91.17.1480
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.