The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microvascular Loops and Networks as Prognostic Indicators in Choroidal and Ciliary Body Melanomas
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malignant melanoma of the ciliary body and choroid of the eye is a tumor that disseminates frequently, and 50% of the diagnosed patients die within 10 years. We investigated the hypothesis that, by histopathologic analysis of the arrangement of microvessels (i.e., small blood vessels) in loops and networks, we might be able to differentiate better those patients with a favorable prognosis from those with a poor prognosis. METHODS: We conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study of melanoma-specific and all-cause mortality for 167 consecutive patients who had an eye surgically removed because of malignant choroidal or ciliary body melanoma during the period from 1972 through 1981. Microvascular loops and networks were evaluated independently by two pathologists who were unaware of patient outcome. RESULTS: Microvascular patterns could be assessed in 134 (80%) of 167 melanoma specimens. The 10-year probability of melanoma-specific survival was worse if microvascular loops (0.45 versus 0.83; two-sided P<.0001) and networks (0.41 versus 0.72, two-sided P<.0001) were present. In multivariate Cox regression analysis of melanoma-specific survival, the hazard ratios were 1.66 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.19-2.30) for the presence of loops and networks as a combined three-category variable, 2.36 (95% CI = 1.37-4.05) for the presence of epithelioid cells, 1.11 (95% CI = 1.03-1.19) for the largest basal tumor diameter (evaluated as a continuous variable), and 2.14 (95% CI = 1.25-3.67) for ciliary body involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with malignant uveal melanoma who have a favorable prognosis can be distinguished from those with a poor prognosis by histopathologic analysis of microvascular patterns in uveal melanoma tumor specimens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Practical Statistics for Medical Research
Altman, D. G. (1990) · doi:10.1201/9780429258589 · Cited by 10,668
Cited by
Vascular Channel Formation by Human Melanoma Cells in Vivo and in Vitro: Vasculogenic Mimicry
Maniotis, A. J., Folberg, R., Hess, A., Seftor, E. A., Gardner, L. M. G., Pe'er, J., Trent, J. M., Meltzer, P. S., & Hendrix, M. J. C. (1999) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65173-5 · Cited by 2,043
Very Long-Term Prognosis of Patients with Malignant Uveal Melanoma
Kujala, E., Ma¨kitie, T., & Kivela¨, T. (2003) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.03-0538 · Cited by 1,045
Self-citationEskelin, S. (2000) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00182-2 · Cited by 403
Antiproliferative Activities of Citrus Flavonoids against Six Human Cancer Cell Lines
Manthey, J. A., & Guthrie, N. (2002) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf020121d · Cited by 362
FOLBERG, R., & MANIOTIS, A. J. (2004) · APMIS · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0463.2004.apm11207-0810.x · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Makitie, T., Summanen, P., Tarkkanen, A., & Kivela, T.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-02-17
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 359-367
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2132418159
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microvascular Loops and Networks as Prognostic Indicators in Choroidal and Ciliary Body Melanomas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/91.4.359
- The paper
- Makitie, T., Summanen, P., Tarkkanen, A., & Kivela, T. (1999). Microvascular Loops and Networks as Prognostic Indicators in Choroidal and Ciliary Body Melanomas. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/91.4.359
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.