The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Population-Based Study of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in 1035 Unselected Finnish Breast Cancer Patients
Abstract
Two highly penetrant genes involved in hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer syndromes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, have been identified (1,2). Mutations in these genes occur throughout their coding sequences, making large-scale testing for mutations challenging. It is, therefore, not surprising that only a few studies have reported estimates of the mutation frequencies among unselected breast cancer patients. Usually, only a few hundred patients have been analyzed in each study, with mutation frequencies ranging from 3.3% to 5.7% for BRCA1 (3–5). The largest studies of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations have been carried out in isolated populations, such as the Icelanders or Ashkenazi Jews (6), where individual, highly recurrent founder mutations account for the majority of all mutations (7,8). Results derived from such populations may, however, be biased by the specific nature of these mutations. In whole-gene mutation screening performed by two independent groups (9–11) on 188 breast and breast–ovarian cancer families in Finland, 11 mutations accounted for the vast majority (84%) of all detected BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Besides these recurrent BRCA1 and BRCA2 founder mutations, eight other mutations have been identified only once in the Finnish population [(9–12); Vahteristo P, Eerola H, Tamminen A, Blomqvist C, Nevanlinna H: unpublished observations]. The 11 known mutations provide a unique, rapid way to analyze the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations at the population level, without a bias toward any individual founder mutation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antoniou, A., Pharoah, P. D. P., Narod, S., Risch, H. A., Eyfjord, J. E., Hopper, J. L., Loman, N., Olsson, H., Johannsson, O., Borg, Å., et al. (2003) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/375033 · Cited by 3,680
Self-citationBlows, F. M., Driver, K. E., Schmidt, M. K., Broeks, A., van Leeuwen, F. E., Wesseling, J., Cheang, M. C., Gelmon, K., Nielsen, T. O., Blomqvist, C., et al. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000279 · Cited by 1,116
Yang, X. R., Chang-Claude, J., Goode, E. L., Couch, F. J., Nevanlinna, H., Milne, R. L., Gaudet, M., Schmidt, M. K., Broeks, A., Cox, A., et al. (2011) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djq526 · Cited by 691
Breast cancer risk associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 in diverse populations
Fackenthal, J. D., & Olopade, O. I. (2007) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2054 · Cited by 488
The Breast Cancer Association Consortium (2006) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djj374 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Syrjakoski, K.
- Venue
- Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-09-20
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 1529-1531
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2142299395
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Population-Based Study of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in 1035 Unselected Finnish Breast Cancer Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/92.18.1529
- The paper
- Syrjakoski, K. (2000). Population-Based Study of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in 1035 Unselected Finnish Breast Cancer Patients. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/92.18.1529
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.