Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Patterns of HER-2/neu Amplification and Overexpression in Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer

Simon, R., Nocito, A., Hubscher, T., Bucher, C., Torhorst, J., Schraml, P., Bubendorf, L., Mihatsch, M. M., Moch, H., Wilber, K., Schotzau, A., Kononen, J., Sauter, G.·2001·JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Only 25% of patients with HER-2/neu-positive metastatic breast tumors respond favorably to trastuzamab (Herceptin) treatment. We hypothesized that a high failure rate of patients on trastuzamab could result if some of the metastases were HER-2 negative and these metastases ultimately determine the course of the disease. METHODS: We used tissue microarrays (TMAs) containing four samples each from 196 lymph node-negative primary tumors, 196 lymph node-positive primary tumors, and three different lymph node metastases from each lymph node-positive tumor to estimate HER-2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and Her-2 protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: FISH and IHC analyses gave the same result with respect to HER-2 status for 93.7% of the tissues contained in the TMAs. Tissue samples were, therefore, considered to be HER-2 positive if they were positive for either HER-2 DNA amplification or Her-2 protein expression and HER-2 negative if both FISH and IHC gave a negative result. The HER-2 status of lymph node-positive primary tumors was maintained in the majority of their metastases. For HER-2-positive primary tumors, 77% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 59% to 90%) had entirely HER-2-positive metastases, 6.5% (95% CI = 8% to 21%) had entirely HER-2-negative metastases, and 16.3% (95% CI = 5% to 34%) had a mixture of HER-2-positive and HER-2-negative metastases. For HER-2-negative primary tumors, 95% (95% CI = 88% to 98%) had metastases that were entirely negative for HER-2. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that differences in HER-2 expression between primary tumors and their lymph node metastases cannot explain the high fraction of nonresponders to trastuzamab therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/93.15.1141

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 290

Metadata

Authors
Simon, R., Nocito, A., Hubscher, T., Bucher, C., Torhorst, J., Schraml, P., Bubendorf, L., Mihatsch, M. M., Moch, H., Wilber, K., Schotzau, A., Kononen, J., & Sauter, G.
Venue
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2001-08-01
Volume
93
Issue
15
Pages
1141-1146
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2167167632
Cited by
290
References
0
FWCI
11.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns of HER-2/neu Amplification and Overexpression in Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/93.15.1141
The paper
Simon, R., Nocito, A., Hubscher, T., Bucher, C., Torhorst, J., Schraml, P., Bubendorf, L., Mihatsch, M. M., Moch, H., Wilber, K., Schotzau, A., Kononen, J., & Sauter, G. (2001). Patterns of HER-2/neu Amplification and Overexpression in Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/93.15.1141

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.