The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Patterns of HER-2/neu Amplification and Overexpression in Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Only 25% of patients with HER-2/neu-positive metastatic breast tumors respond favorably to trastuzamab (Herceptin) treatment. We hypothesized that a high failure rate of patients on trastuzamab could result if some of the metastases were HER-2 negative and these metastases ultimately determine the course of the disease. METHODS: We used tissue microarrays (TMAs) containing four samples each from 196 lymph node-negative primary tumors, 196 lymph node-positive primary tumors, and three different lymph node metastases from each lymph node-positive tumor to estimate HER-2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and Her-2 protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: FISH and IHC analyses gave the same result with respect to HER-2 status for 93.7% of the tissues contained in the TMAs. Tissue samples were, therefore, considered to be HER-2 positive if they were positive for either HER-2 DNA amplification or Her-2 protein expression and HER-2 negative if both FISH and IHC gave a negative result. The HER-2 status of lymph node-positive primary tumors was maintained in the majority of their metastases. For HER-2-positive primary tumors, 77% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 59% to 90%) had entirely HER-2-positive metastases, 6.5% (95% CI = 8% to 21%) had entirely HER-2-negative metastases, and 16.3% (95% CI = 5% to 34%) had a mixture of HER-2-positive and HER-2-negative metastases. For HER-2-negative primary tumors, 95% (95% CI = 88% to 98%) had metastases that were entirely negative for HER-2. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that differences in HER-2 expression between primary tumors and their lymph node metastases cannot explain the high fraction of nonresponders to trastuzamab therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wolff, A. C., Hammond, M. E. H., Schwartz, J. N., Hagerty, K. L., Allred, D. C., Cote, R. J., Dowsett, M., Fitzgibbons, P. L., Hanna, W. M., Langer, A., et al. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.09.2775 · Cited by 4,434
Owens, M. A., Horten, B. C., & Da Silva, M. M. (2004) · Clinical Breast Cancer · doi:10.3816/cbc.2004.n.011 · Cited by 657
Vermeulen, P. B., Gasparini, G., Fox, S. B., Colpaert, C., Marson, L. P., Gion, M., Beliën, J. A. M., de Waal, R. M. W., Van Marck, E., Magnani, E., et al. (2002) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(02)00094-1 · Cited by 488
Estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) gene amplification is frequent in breast cancer
Holst, F., Stahl, P. R., Ruiz, C., Hellwinkel, O., Jehan, Z., Wendland, M., Lebeau, A., Terracciano, L., Al-Kuraya, K., Jänicke, F., et al. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng2006 · Cited by 375
Self-citationComparison of HER-2 status between primary breast cancer and corresponding distant metastatic sites
Gancberg, D., Di Leo, A., Cardoso, F., Rouas, G., Pedrocchi, M., Paesmans, M., Verhest, A., Bernard-Marty, C., Piccart, M. J., & Larsimont, D. (2002) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdf252 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Simon, R., Nocito, A., Hubscher, T., Bucher, C., Torhorst, J., Schraml, P., Bubendorf, L., Mihatsch, M. M., Moch, H., Wilber, K., Schotzau, A., Kononen, J., & Sauter, G.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-08-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1141-1146
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2167167632
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns of HER-2/neu Amplification and Overexpression in Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/93.15.1141
- The paper
- Simon, R., Nocito, A., Hubscher, T., Bucher, C., Torhorst, J., Schraml, P., Bubendorf, L., Mihatsch, M. M., Moch, H., Wilber, K., Schotzau, A., Kononen, J., & Sauter, G. (2001). Patterns of HER-2/neu Amplification and Overexpression in Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/93.15.1141
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.