The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Advanced-Stage Prostate Cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: African-Americans have twice the risk of non-Hispanic whites for presenting with advanced-stage prostate cancer. To investigate the reasons for this difference, we evaluated the association between race/ethnicity and advanced-stage prostate cancer, adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, and pathologic factors. METHODS: A population-based cohort of 3173 men diagnosed with prostate cancer between October 1, 1994, and October 31, 1995, was analyzed. Medical record abstracts and self-administered survey questionnaires were used to obtain information regarding race/ethnicity, age, marital status, insurance status, educational level, household income, employment status, comorbidity, urinary function, prostate-specific antigen level, tumor grade, and clinical stage. The odds ratio (OR) for advanced-stage prostate cancer was estimated with weighted logistic regression analysis. All P: values were two-sided. RESULTS: Clinically advanced-stage prostate cancers were detected more frequently in African-Americans (12.3%) and Hispanics (10.5%) than in non-Hispanic whites (6.3%). Socioeconomic, clinical, and pathologic factors each accounted for about 15% of the increased relative risk. After adjusting for all covariates, the risk remained statistically significantly increased for African-Americans (OR = 2.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.43 to 3.58) but not for Hispanics (OR = 1.23; 95% CI = 0.73 to 2.08). CONCLUSION: Traditional socioeconomic, clinical, and pathologic factors accounted for the increased relative risk for presenting with advanced-stage prostate cancer in Hispanic but not in African-American men.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ethnic differences among patients with cutaneous melanoma
Cormier, J. N., Xing, Y., Ding, M., Lee, J. E., Mansfield, P. F., Gershenwald, J. E., Ross, M. I., & Du, X. L. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.17.1907 · Cited by 378
Hoffman, K. E., Penson, D. F., Zhao, Z., Huang, L.-C., Conwill, R., Laviana, A. A., Joyce, D. D., Luckenbaugh, A. N., Goodman, M., Hamilton, A. S., et al. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.20675 · Cited by 298
Self-citationHealth outcomes assessment in vulnerable populations: measurement challenges and recommendations
Hahn, E. A., & Cella, D. (2003) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2003.50245 · Cited by 133
Measuring and using admixture to study the genetics of complex diseases
Halder, I., & Shriver, M. D. (2003) · Human Genomics · doi:10.1186/1479-7364-1-1-52 · Cited by 93
Halder, I., Yang, B.-Z., Kranzler, H. R., Stein, M. B., Shriver, M. D., & Gelernter, J. (2009) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.21045 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoffman, R. M., Gilliland, F. D., Eley, J. W., Harlan, L. C., Stephenson, R. A., Stanford, J. L., Albertson, P. C., Hamilton, A. S., Hunt, W. C., & Potosky, A. L.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-03-07
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 388-395
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2139110501
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Racial and Ethnic Differences in Advanced-Stage Prostate Cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/93.5.388
- The paper
- Hoffman, R. M., Gilliland, F. D., Eley, J. W., Harlan, L. C., Stephenson, R. A., Stanford, J. L., Albertson, P. C., Hamilton, A. S., Hunt, W. C., & Potosky, A. L. (2001). Racial and Ethnic Differences in Advanced-Stage Prostate Cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/93.5.388
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.