The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Receipt of Cancer Treatment
Open accessAbstract
A disproportionate number of cancer deaths occur among racial/ethnic minorities, particularly African Americans, who have a 33% higher risk of dying of cancer than whites. Although differences in incidence and stage of disease at diagnosis may contribute to racial disparities in mortality, evidence of racial disparities in the receipt of treatment of other chronic diseases raises questions about the possible role of inequities in the receipt of cancer treatment. To evaluate racial/ethnic disparities in the receipt of cancer treatment, we examined the published literature that addressed access/use of specific cancer treatment procedures, trends in patterns of use, or survival studies. We found evidence of racial disparities in receipt of definitive primary therapy, conservative therapy, and adjuvant therapy. These treatment differences could not be completely explained by racial/ethnic variation in clinically relevant factors. In many studies, these treatment differences were associated with an adverse impact on the health outcomes of racial/ethnic minorities, including more frequent recurrence, shorter disease-free survival, and higher mortality. Reducing the influence of nonclinical factors on the receipt of cancer treatment may, therefore, provide an important means of reducing racial/ethnic disparities in health. New data resources and improved study methodology are needed to better identify and quantify the full spectrum of nonclinical factors that contribute to the higher cancer mortality among racial/ethnic minorities and to develop strategies to facilitate receipt of appropriate cancer care for all patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Effect of Race and Sex on Physicians' Recommendations for Cardiac Catheterization
Schulman, K. A., Berlin, J. A., Harless, W., Kerner, J. F., Sistrunk, S., Gersh, B. J., Dubé, R., Taleghani, C. K., Burke, J. E., Williams, S., et al. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199902253400806 · Cited by 1,934
The effect of patient race and socio-economic status on physicians' perceptions of patients
van Ryn, M., & Burke, J. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00338-x · Cited by 1,509
Inadequate Follow-up of Abnormal Mammograms
McCarthy, B. D., Yood, M. U., Boohaker, E. A., Ward, R. E., Rebner, M., & Johnson, C. C. (1996) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(18)30326-x · Cited by 87
Cited by
Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review
Ford, J. G., Howerton, M. W., Lai, G. Y., Gary, T. L., Bolen, S., Gibbons, M. C., Tilburt, J., Baffi, C., Tanpitukpongse, T. P., Wilson, R. F., et al. (2008) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.23157 · Cited by 1,083
Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD)
Coleman, M. P., Quaresma, M., Berrino, F., Lutz, J.-M., De Angelis, R., Capocaccia, R., Baili, P., Rachet, B., Gatta, G., Hakulinen, T., et al. (2008) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70179-7 · Cited by 1,002
Loree, J. M., Anand, S., Dasari, A., Unger, J. M., Gothwal, A., Ellis, L. M., Varadhachary, G., Kopetz, S., Overman, M. J., & Raghav, K. (2019) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1870 · Cited by 570
Ethnic differences among patients with cutaneous melanoma
Cormier, J. N., Xing, Y., Ding, M., Lee, J. E., Mansfield, P. F., Gershenwald, J. E., Ross, M. I., & Du, X. L. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.17.1907 · Cited by 378
Missed Opportunities: Racial Disparities in Adjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment
Bickell, N. A., Wang, J. J., Oluwole, S., Schrag, D., Godfrey, H., Hiotis, K., Mendez, J., & Guth, A. A. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.04.5799 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Shavers, V. L.
- Venue
- CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-03-06
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 334-357
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2137213403
- Cited by
- 950
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Receipt of Cancer Treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/94.5.334
- The paper
- Shavers, V. L. (2002). Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Receipt of Cancer Treatment. CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/94.5.334
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.