Cited by 5Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningColorectal Cancer Screening and Detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Response to Lehrer and Rheinstein

Open access
Fedewa, Stacey A, Ma, Jiemin, Jemal, Ahmedin·2020·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

We thank Drs Lehrer and Rheinstein for their interest in our recent article published in the Journal. In this article, we reported that prostate cancer incidence rates continued to decline for early staged disease, whereas rates increased for regional- and distant-stage diseases following the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against routine prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for men aged 75 years and older in 2008 and for all men in 2012 (1). For example, among men who were 50 years and older, local-staged prostate cancer incidence decreased by 6.9% per year from 2007 to 2016. In contrast, regional-staged incidence statistically significantly increased by 11.1% per year from 2012 to 2016, and distant-staged prostate cancer incidence increased by 5.0% per year from 2010 to 2016. In our discussion, we state that these findings, along with previously reported stabilization of prostate cancer death rates, can inform the population of the benefits and harms of PSA testing. Lehrer and Rheinstein examined stage-specific prostate cancer survival trends. They report that 12-month relative survival for patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2016 remained 100% for localized prostate cancer and increased from 72% to 81.4% for distant-stage disease (2). The authors state, “Our analysis confirms the recent stabilization of prostate cancer death rates after a steady decline since the early 1990s.” Further, the authors conclude, “Given the complications associated with curative treatment of prostate cancer, especially in older men, we feel that the original USPSTF recommendation against routine PSA screening was well taken.” However, death rates, which are the number of deaths per 100 000 men in the general population, were not included in Lehrer and Rheinstein’s analyses. Previous studies have examined prostate cancer mortality through 2017, finding that overall prostate cancer mortality trend stabilized from 2013 to 2017 (3). Here, we examined stage-specific prostate cancer death rates in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results population-based data between 2010 and 2017 with the JoinPoint regression software tool (4), shown in Figure 1. Among men aged 50 years and older, localized prostate cancer death rates declined and distant-staged prostate cancer death rates rose between 2012 and 2017. Among men aged 50–74 years, distant-staged death rates rose by 2.62% between 2010 and 2017 and by 5.54% between 2012 and 2017 among men aged 75 years and older. Data on prostate cancer incidence rates, treatment, survival, and death rates, as well as simulation modeling, can inform the population of the benefits and harms of PSA testing as well as update recommendations (5). In 2018, the US Preventive Services Task Force updated its recommendations for individualized decision making for PSA-based screening for men aged 55–69 years (6). Continued surveillance of PSA testing, prostate cancer occurrence, and outcomes is needed to inform cancer control efforts. Stage-specific prostate cancer death rates by stage, age group, and year of diagnosis, SEER 18 (2010-2017).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djaa093

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the United States, prostate cancer mortality rates have stabilized during the most recent period after declining for several decades, in part because of the increase in advanced-stage disease.

    “In the United States, mortality rates have stabilized during the most recent period after declining for several decades, in part because of the increase in advancedstage disease.103,104”

    From Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. (2024) · cites this paper as [103]

    The Response to > CORRESPONDENCE section (page not specified) reports that overall prostate cancer mortality stabilized from 2013 to 2017, while death rates from distant-stage disease rose and those from localized disease declined. The Response to section also quotes a steady decline in death rates since the early 1990s. The paper does not establish that the increase in advanced-stage disease caused the overall stabilization. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 6 · Cited by 5

Metadata

Authors
Fedewa, S. A., Ma, J., & Jemal, A.
Affiliations
American Cancer Society (US)
Corresponding author
Jemal, Ahmedin
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2020-06-30
Volume
112
Issue
10
Pages
1069-1070
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W3039469286
Cited by
5
References
6
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Keywords
prostate cancer incidence, prostate-specific antigen testing, USPSTF recommendations, prostate cancer mortality, stage-specific survival, localized prostate cancer, prostate cancer screening, SEER, SEER stage
MeSH terms
Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Prostatic Neoplasms, Incidence, Advisory Committees, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review